Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pichler, 355 So. 2d 1302.
- State Of Louisiana v. Brandon Applewhite La. 2024
-
State of Louisiana v. James R. Susan
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Also, the Louisiana Supreme Court has found the granting of open file discovery to the defense to be “significant in resolving whether or not defendant was prejudiced in preparation of his defense by an insufficient recitation of the essential facts constituting the offense charged.” State v. Bruce, 11-991, p. 14 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Michael Lee Jones
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
the court applied the rationale of State v. James, supra, to cases in which a defendant raises a defect in the indictment prior to conviction.
- State v. Bruce 102 So. 3d 1029 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
- State v. Michels 726 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
-
State v. Darville
573 So. 2d 1155
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
1979) the court applied the rationale of State v. James, supra , to cases in which a defendant raises a defect in the indictment prior to conviction.
- State v. Jones 540 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Griffin 495 So. 2d 1306 La. 1986
-
State v. Cross
461 So. 2d 1246
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1979) the court applied the rationale of State v. James, supra , to cases in which a defendant raises a defect in the indictment prior to conviction.
- State v. Braxton 458 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Chism 436 So. 2d 464 La. 1983
- State Ex Rel. Halvorsen v. Blackburn 388 So. 2d 806 La. 1980
- State v. Gainey 376 So. 2d 1240 La. 1979
- State v. Martin 376 So. 2d 300 La. 1979