Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Weems, 358 So. 2d 285.
- State of Louisiana v. Kenmiccael Dano Ray La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
-
State v. Davis
768 So. 2d 201
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
5 Cir.1992), writ denied, (La.
- State v. Haddad 767 So. 2d 682 La. 2000
-
State v. Harris
679 So. 2d 549
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Davis, supra ; State v. Dukes, supra .
- State v. Wolfe 630 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- State v. Leeming 612 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
- State v. Miller 587 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Smith 576 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- State v. Clark 553 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
-
State v. Mayeux
526 So. 2d 1243
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
and State v. Hamilton, 459 So.
- State v. Digilormo 505 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Caldwell 493 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Hamilton 459 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
State v. Booth
448 So. 2d 1363
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957)
- State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
- State v. Bolton 408 So. 2d 250 La. 1981
- State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
- State v. Bates 397 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
-
State v. Nicholas
397 So. 2d 1308
La. 1981
However, in order to underscore that a trial judge's ruling concerning the relevancy of evidence will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a clear abuse of discretion, the following cases are cited:
- State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
- State v. Washington 386 So. 2d 1368 La. 1980
- State v. Washington 386 So. 2d 1368 La. 1980
- State v. Alford 384 So. 2d 761 La. 1980
- State v. Echols 376 So. 2d 1244 La. 1979
-
State v. Burch
365 So. 2d 1263
La. 1979
State v. Weems, La., (1978); State v. Winston, La., (1977); State v. Gallow, La., (1976).
- State v. Jackson 362 So. 2d 1082 La. 1978