DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Nelson, 357 So. 2d 1100.

15 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
    However, in order for such evidence to be admissible to prove intent, or for another permissible purpose, there must be a real and genuine contested issue of intent at trial; State v. Prieur, supra, and the probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect.
  • State v. Vail 150 So. 3d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    However, in order for such evidence to be admissible to prove intent, or for another permissible purpose, there must be a real and genuine contested issue of intent at trial; State v. Pri-eur, supra, and the probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect.
  • State v. Romero 533 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    15:445, Wigmore, supra; (2) there must be a real and genuine contested issue of intent at trial, State v. Germain, supra [ ]; (3) the probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect, State v. Harris, supra [ ], State v. Prieur, supra [ (La.
  • State v. Smith 513 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Horton 458 So. 2d 445 La. 1984
  • State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Being relevant, such evidence is admissible, provided that there is a real and genuinely contested issue of intent at trial, State v. Kahey, supra; and further, that the prejudicial effect of such evidence is outweighed by its probative value.
  • State v. Kahey 436 So. 2d 475 La. 1983
    15:445, Wigmore, supra; (2) there must be a real and genuine contested issue of intent at trial, State v. Germain, supra ; (3) the probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect, State v. Harris, supra , State v. Prieur, supra .
  • State v. Jordan 420 So. 2d 420 La. 1982
  • State v. Moak 387 So. 2d 1108 La. 1980
  • State v. Davis 389 So. 2d 71 La. 1980
  • State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
    However for such evidence to be admissible to prove intent, there must be a real and genuine contested issue of intent at trial, and the probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect.
  • State v. Coleman 369 So. 2d 1286 La. 1979
  • State v. Hamilton 364 So. 2d 585 La. 1978
    1978) we applied Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 495.1, as interpreted by Carter , to facts showing that separate and disconnected offenses had been tried jointly despite the defendant's pretrial motion for severance, and held that a severance should have been granted because a separate trial of any o
  • State v. Monroe 364 So. 2d 570 La. 1978
    However, in order for such evidence to be admissible to prove intent, or for another permissible purpose, there must be a real and genuine contested issue of intent at trial; State v. Prieur, supra , and the probative value of the evidence must outweigh its prejudicial effect.
  • State v. Lewis 358 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
    decided April 10, 1978; , decided March 6, 1978; (La.