Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dilworth, 358 So. 2d 1254.

27 citing documents.

State v. Stock 212 So. 3d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Cody Keith Fontenot -Aka- Cody Fontenot La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Likewise, in Kennerson, 702 So.2d at 863, this court found an owner’s testimony is generally sufficient to prove value: -57, the court stated the following concerning evidence sufficient to prove value: In State v. McCray, La., (1974), we stated: “Unless it is shown the owner lacks knowledge of the value of a movable [furniture], his testimony as to value
State v. Thompson 189 So. 3d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Rejecting his argument, we observed that “[ujnless it is shown that the'owner lacks knowledge of -the value of a movable, his or her *1144 testimony as to value is generally admissible, with its weight being- left to the jury.” Id.
State v. Mitchell 181 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
*807 (La.1978); State v. James, 36,493 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), ; State v. Henry, 46,406 (La.App.2d Cir.8/10/11), ; State v. Johnson, 31,448 (La.App.2d Cir.3/31/99), , writ denied, 1999-1689 (La.11/12/99), , cert.
State v. Bailey 180 So. 3d 442 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. James, 36,493 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), ; State v. Henry, 46,406 (La.App.2d Cir.8/10/11), ; State v. Johnson, 31,448 (La.App.2d Cir.3/31/99), , writ denied, 1999-1689 (La.11/12/99), , cert.
State in the Intrest of T. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
State ex rel. T.H. 140 So. 3d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Henry 73 So. 3d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. James, 36,493 (La.App.2d Cir.12/11/02), ; State v. Johnson, 31,488 (La.App.2d Cir.3/31/99), , writ denied, 99-1689 (La.l 1/12/99), , cert.
State v. Boyd 999 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In support of its argument, where the Supreme Court stated the following concerning evidence sufficient to prove value: In State v. McCray, La., (1974), we stated: "Unless it is shown the owner lacks knowledge of the value of a movable [furniture], his testimony as to value is generally admissible, with its weight being
State v. Ramsdell 949 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
State v. James 833 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Kennerson, 97-391 (La.App.
State v. Johnson 747 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
State v. Johnson 704 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Kennerson 702 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
However, he repeated, “But I still maintain that anything that runs is worth over five hundred dollars.” -1257 (La.1978), the court stated the following concerning evidence sufficient to prove value: In State v. McCray, La., (1974), the court stated: *870 “Unless it is shown the owner lacks knowledge of the value of a movable [furniture], his testimony as to value is generally admissible, with its weig
State v. Kennerson 702 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-57 , the court stated the following concerning evidence sufficient to prove value: In State v. McCray, La., (1974), we stated: "Unless it is shown the owner lacks knowledge of the value of a movable [furniture], his testimony as to value is generally admissible, with its weight being left to the ju
State v. Gatlin 612 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
State v. Hayes 585 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Davis 569 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Bruce 556 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Jordan 522 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the defendant objected to the testimony of owners of an antique fence and of an antique dealer regarding the value of the fence because they were not qualified as experts.
State v. King 520 So. 2d 1260 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
: In addition, the defendant's truck was stolen a few days after his arrest and was therefore not available at the time of the trial.
State v. Dominick 506 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
State v. Coleman 486 So. 2d 995 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
[5] See, prosecution for theft of a fence that was four feet high and thirty-one feet long; prosecution for taking a deer out of season.
State v. Brown 480 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Great American Insurance Co. v. St. James Parish Sheriff's Office 461 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the court held that a photograph of a 31 feet long portion of a wrought iron fence was admissible, in the absence of a showing that the defendant was prejudiced.
State v. Bell 404 So. 2d 974 La. 1981