Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Everett v. Goldman, 359 So. 2d 1256.

158 citing documents.

Jenkins v. Whitfield 505 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Crier v. Whitecloud 496 So. 2d 305 La. 1986
In Re Beychok 495 So. 2d 1278 La. 1986
No. 2, -88 (La.1978); (La.
McLean v. Hunter 486 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Maltby v. Gauthier 489 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Desselle v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 482 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Hill v. Brentwood Hospital, Inc. 480 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
C.J. Richard Lumber Co. v. Melancon 476 So. 2d 1018 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Parham v. Hughes, supra, and cases cited therein.
State v. Vice 476 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
No. 2, -88 (La.1978); ” The facts reveal that the defendant is not a member of a “suspect class” of persons.
Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University 477 So. 2d 1094 La. 1985
1979); instead, opting for a uniform standard of judicial review which all legislation is to be judged under (a substantial furtherance of a legitimate "state purpose" test).
Emery v. City of New Orleans Through Rochon 473 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605, 612 (5th Cir.1964)
Sibley v. Board of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University 462 So. 2d 149 La. 1985
we said: This provision, like the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, protects an individual's access to the judicial process.
Crier v. Whitecloud 455 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Valentine v. Thomas, supra at 293
Juneau v. Hartford Ins. Co. 458 So. 2d 1011 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Nix v. King 457 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Bruno v. Department of Police 451 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Sibley v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. ST. UNIV., ETC. 446 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Williams on Behalf of Williams v. Kushner 449 So. 2d 455 La. 1984
Sabino v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 447 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); (La.App.
State, Through Dept. of Health v. King 447 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Stuckey, ; cf. Singlemann v. Davis, 240 La.
Followed Aston v. Lazarus 439 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Under the limited inquiry created by the posture [1] which upheld the provision in question here against an attack of unconstitutionality grounded in an asserted violation of equal protection of the laws and due process provisions of the State and Federal Constitutions, as well as of this court in Authement v. Luke
State v. Huntley 438 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Stuckey v. Stuckey 434 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Valentine v. Thomas 433 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Blanchard v. Farmer 431 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Williams v. Lallie Kemp Charity Hosp. 428 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
McElveen v. LeJeune 427 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Vincent v. Romagosa 425 So. 2d 1237 La. 1983
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Johnson 426 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Fundamental rights for equal protection purposes include such rights as freedom of speech and association, exercise of the voting franchise, freedom of interstate travel, the right to privacy, and other fundamental liberties
Authement v. Luke 418 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
By agreement of both parties, the use of the medical review panel may be waived.”
Wyble v. St. Luke General Hosp. 415 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
City of Lake Charles v. Henning 414 So. 2d 331 La. 1982
Common Cause/Louisiana v. State 404 So. 2d 1236 La. 1981
Amedee v. Southern Baptist Hospital 405 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Roberts v. Russo 400 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
926, 933; Everett v. Goldman, La., ; Desselles v. Brumfield, La.App., ; Travasos v. New Orleans Metairie Hospital, La.App., ; Chivleatto v. Divinity, La.App., ; Knepper v. State, Dept. of Health & Hum.
Hodge v. Lafayette General Hospital 399 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
40:1299.47(A) and (B) as being "reasonably related to the guarantee of continued health care for our citizens at reasonable cost."
McElveen v. State ex rel. Municipal Police Employees Retirement System 399 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
See Everett v. Goldman, La., (1978); Succession of Thompson, La., (1979), and more recently Acorn v. New Orleans, La., (1979).
Followed Derouen v. Kolb 397 So. 2d 791 La. 1981
Timmons v. MUN. FIRE & POLICE CIVIL SERVICE BD. 395 So. 2d 1372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Bazley v. Tortorich 397 So. 2d 475 La. 1981
Lombardo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 394 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
but contends that the approved sections of the act do not abridge a fundamental right to a fair trial as does R.S.
Vincent v. Romagosa 390 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
plaintiff filed a medical malpractice action.
Louisiana Division of the Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 391 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
addressed an equal protection challenge to the Medical Malpractice Act at 1265: “Both the federal constitution and the Louisiana constitution mandate equal protection of the laws.
League of Women Voters v. City of New Orleans 381 So. 2d 441 La. 1980
Travasos v. New Orleans Metairie Hospital Foundation 381 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
We pointed out that a more proper procedural device leading up to the dismissal of such a
Bazley v. Tortorich 380 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Succession of Robins, supra
Jarvis v. Lafayette General Hospital 379 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Chivleatto v. Divinity 379 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
[Emphasis added] Unless a health care provider qualifies it is clearly not "covered," Everett v. Goldman, La.1978, , and the one year medical malpractice prescription of R.S.
Cashio v. Baton Rouge General Hospital 378 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Ferguson v. Lankford 374 So. 2d 1205 La. 1979
we noted: "The most significant provisions of the act fit generally in the following scheme.