Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Murray, 357 So. 2d 1121.
-
State v. Hayes
16 So. 3d 604
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
rev’d on other grounds, State v. Skipper, 2004-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State of Louisiana v. Gregory John Ruiz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
See, reversed on other grounds.
-
State v. Ruiz
3 So. 3d 671
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
See, reversed on other grounds.
-
State v. Baker
970 So. 2d 948
La. 2008
rev'd on other grounds, State v. Skipper, 2004-2137 p. 24 (La.6/29/05), .
- State v. Sims 973 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
-
State of Louisiana v. Todd Vincent Edwards
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
and any appellate decisions, as discussed herein, which stand for the proposition that a prior conviction must be placed in the charging instrument of the second or subsequent drug-related offense or proved to the jury in order to enhance the sentence of a drug-related felony under L
- State v. Edwards 963 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
-
State v. Ruiz
955 So. 2d 81
La. 2007
See, reversed on other grounds.
- State v. Smith 952 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and any appellate decisions, as discussed herein, which stand for the proposition that a prior conviction must be placed in the charging instrument of the second or subsequent drug-related offense or proved to the jury in order to enhance the
- State v. Robertson 931 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- State v. Ruiz 931 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State of Louisiana v. Gregory John Ruiz
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and any appellate decisions, as discussed herein, which stand for the proposition that a prior conviction must be placed in the charging instrument of the second or subsequent drug-related offense or proved to the jury in order to enhance the sentence of a drug-related felony under L
-
State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
and any appellate decisions, as discussed herein, which stand for the proposition that a prior conviction must be placed in the charging instrument of the second or subsequent drug-related offense or proved to the jury in order to enhance the sentence of a drug-related felony und
- State v. Senegal 931 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
-
State v. Garner
913 So. 2d 874
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
overruled on other grounds, State v. Skipper, 2004-2137 (La.6/29/05), .
-
State v. Skipper
906 So. 2d 399
La. 2005
the defendant was found guilty of distribution of a controlled dangerous substance.
-
State v. White
907 So. 2d 180
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Additionally, however, our supreme court held: By statute, the district attorney is accorded wide discretion in determining when and how he shall prosecute.
- State v. Iverson 855 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- State v. Palmer 834 So. 2d 16 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
- State v. Howard 814 So. 2d 47 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
State v. Wells
815 So. 2d 1063
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
In so holding, like their Third Circuit brethren, the court relied on the supreme court cases
- State v. Johnson 796 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
- State v. Lee 778 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- State v. King 757 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- State v. Myers 753 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- State v. Franklin 693 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
- State v. Nicholas 652 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- State v. Rodriguez 572 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- State v. Matthieu 506 So. 2d 1209 La. 1987
- State v. Rogers 494 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
State v. Harris
478 So. 2d 233
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-43 (La.1979); ” , at page 1021 (La.App.
- State v. Braxton 458 So. 2d 1017 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Green
454 So. 2d 885
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
and compare, State v. Bienvenu, 260 La.
-
State v. Tanner
432 So. 2d 1186
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
A, but our procedure does not authorize the use of the motion to suppress to test the admissibility of evidence constitutionally seized.” State v. Dudek, 263 La.
- State v. Duncan 420 So. 2d 1105 La. 1982
- State v. Dowling 387 So. 2d 1165 La. 1980
- State Ex Rel. Halvorsen v. Blackburn 388 So. 2d 806 La. 1980
- State v. Hicks 376 So. 2d 118 La. 1979
- State v. Wilson 362 So. 2d 536 La. 1978