Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bennett, 357 So. 2d 1136.

23 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Michael Halford La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
La. 2020
State v. Holcombe 35 So. 3d 1084 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Parent 836 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Taylor, 94-0696 (La.9/6/94), ; -1140 (La.
State v. Nash 821 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Sarrio, 01-543 (La.App.
State v. Sarrio 803 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
-1140 (La.1978), the court stated the following: This statute creates two distinct privileges.
State v. Cooper 678 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
where it was held that calling a defendant's previous counsel to identify him in subsequent habitual offender adjudication was not a violation of attorney-client privilege since the fact of prior representation was a matter of public record.
State v. Taylor 642 So. 2d 160 La. 1994
State v. Hughes 587 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Fisher 507 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Smith 489 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
as follows: "This statute, in effect, creates two distinct privileges.
State v. Ward 483 So. 2d 578 La. 1986
-40 (La.1978), this court held that the "...
State v. Capano 466 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
: "This statute, in effect, creates two distinct privileges.
State v. Welch 448 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Day 400 So. 2d 622 La. 1981
(1978), this Court held that it was improper for a prosecutor to comment on the defendant's assertion of his privilege as to private conversations between husband and wife.
State v. Adams 394 So. 2d 1204 La. 1981
State v. Stevenson 390 So. 2d 1292 La. 1980
State v. Molinario 383 So. 2d 345 La. 1980
State v. Gomez 365 So. 2d 1313 La. 1978
State v. Lee 364 So. 2d 1024 La. 1978
State v. Mosely 360 So. 2d 844 La. 1978