Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jones, 359 So. 2d 95.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. Dupree 950 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. King 799 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Bright 706 So. 2d 1386 La. 1997
    1866, 1874 , 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981); Savino v. Murray, 82 F.3d 593, 604 (4th Cir.1996); cert.
  • State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
  • State v. Wilson 679 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Smith 677 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Bourque 636 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Knowles 598 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
    State v. Rideau, 249 La.
  • State v. Bell 543 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Harris 527 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Pravata 522 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Martin 486 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    In State v. Jones, La., (1978), we upheld a trial court’s ruling which precluded counsel from arguing that defendant’s ‘neurotic, prone-to-hysteria mental condition precluded the specific intent required for murder ...
  • State v. Brogan 453 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    In State v. Jones, La., (1978), we upheld a trial court's ruling which precluded counsel from arguing that defendant's `neurotic, prone-to-hysteria mental condition precluded the specific intent required for murder ...'
  • State v. Welcome 458 So. 2d 1235 La. 1984
  • State v. Birdsong 452 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Felde 422 So. 2d 370 La. 1982
  • State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
  • State v. Murray 375 So. 2d 80 La. 1979
    State v. Rideau, 249 La.
  • State v. Wade 375 So. 2d 97 La. 1979
  • State v. Lecompte 371 So. 2d 239 La. 1979
    In State v. Jones, La., (1978), we upheld a trial court's ruling which precluded counsel from arguing that defendant's "neurotic, prone-to-hysteria mental condition precluded the specific intent required for murder.
  • State v. Andrews 369 So. 2d 1049 La. 1979
  • State v. English 367 So. 2d 815 La. 1979
    Although Louisiana is among the minority of states that reject the defense of diminished responsibility as it relates to the guilt or innocence of the defendant, and authorities cited therein, the legislature may well have intended that a similar concept be applied to a determination of whether the death penalty should be inflicted upon the defendant.
  • State v. Weber 364 So. 2d 952 La. 1978
    State v. Jones, La., (1978); State v. Johanson, La., (1976); State *957 v. Berry, La., (1975); State v. Rideau, 249 La.