Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alexander v. Burroughs Corp., 359 So. 2d 607.

142 citing documents.

F & S OFFSHORE v. Serv. MacH. & Shipbuilding 430 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Little v. Kalo Laboratories, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Brummerloh v. Firemen's Ins.
Magnolia Const. Co., Inc. v. Causey 421 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
and urges that interest on the judgment should run from the date of active breach of the contract.
Drs. Brown, Carter & Sauls v. Sauls 418 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Hicks v. Rucker Pharmacal Co., Inc., (La.App.
Musemeche v. G & J Mobile Home Ser. & Supplies 425 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
the Supreme Court took up argument that a bad faith seller should not be entitled to compensation from the purchaser for the use of the thing because LSA-C.C.
Champion v. Panel Era Mfg. Co. 410 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Heap v. Weber Const. Co. of Louisiana, Inc. 407 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Capitol City Leasing Corp. v. Hill 404 So. 2d 935 La. 1981
the Court, through Justice Dixon, stated, "A credit for a purchaser's use of a product may be proper in certain instances, even in favor of a bad faith seller.....
Reeves v. Dixie Brick, Inc. 403 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Roques v. Alfonso 399 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Hicks v. Rucker Pharmacal Co., Inc., (La.App.
Bustamante v. Manale 397 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
A proper judgment would award the buyer the $50,500 price plus the mortgage interest paidperhaps plus legal interest on both from judicial or earlier demand, Alexander v. Burroughs Corp., La.1978, , on the theory that the use of this house was so inconvenient as not to be an equivalent for interest.
DeBlieux v. Arkla Industries, Inc. 390 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
CREDIT FOR USE The principles applicable to the issue of whether or not Arkla is entitled to a wherein the Court stated: "A credit for a purchaser's use of a product may be proper in certain instances, even in favor of a bad faith seller.
Marsh v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. 394 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Weber v. Crescent Ford Truck Sales, Inc. 393 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Paul v. Ford Motor Co. 392 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Cassey v. Arnaudville Industries, Inc. 393 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Ricard v. State 390 So. 2d 882 La. 1980
Fowler v. Western Union Tel.
Consolidated Sewerage District of the City of Kenner v. Guenther 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Hicks v. Rucker Pharmacal Co., Inc., (La.App.
CONSOLIDATED SEWERAGE DIST. ETC. v. Schulin 387 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Hicks v. Rucker Pharmacal Co., Inc., (La.App.
Insurance Planning Service Corp. v. Mercedes Benz of North America, Inc. 387 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
2nd Cir. 1977), affirmed in part and reversed in part on other grounds, (La.App.
Lacey v. Baywood Truck & MacHinery 381 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Muller v. A. K. Durnin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., supra; (La.App.
Ahlers v. Ahlers 384 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
John Deere Indus. Equip. Co. v. Willett Timber Co. 380 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Associates Financial Services Co., Inc. v. Ryan 382 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Our Supreme Court, stated: "Compensation for the buyer's use, however, ought not be granted automatically by the courts; even the value of an extensive use may be overridden by great inconveniences incurred because of the defective nature of the thing and constant interruptions in service caused by the seller's attempts to re
Ashley v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. 380 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
2nd Cir. 1977), affirmed and amended, (La.
Abdelbaki v. University Presbyterian Church 380 So. 2d 35 La. 1980
Brummerloh v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark 377 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Nations v. Excess Ins. Co. 377 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
a five-day jury trial with several third party demands; Riverland Oil Mill v. Underwriters for Lloyd's, supra, $17,500 fee where the insureds had paid their attorney's fees and expenses of approximately that amount as of trial date, the trial lasted seven days, the issues were extremely complex, and recovery was $200,000; and $7,000 fee for services rendered in the trial court, court of appeal and supreme court, in a redhibitory action involving recovery of approximately $25,000 and involving co
Philippe v. Browning Arms Co. 375 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Cangelosi v. McInnis Peterson Chevrolet, Inc. 373 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Harris v. Bardwell 373 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Huffman-Euro Motors v. PHYSICAL THERAPY, ETC. 373 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Bruner v. Bruner 373 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
the supreme court awarded interest on attorney's fees in a redhibition action from the date of judgment.
Hicks v. Rucker Pharmacal Co., Inc. 367 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
Cox v. Moore 367 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc. 365 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
The case has been remanded to us by the Louisiana Supreme Court
Benard v. Bradley Automotive 365 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Thibodeaux v. Meaux's Auto Sales, Inc. 364 So. 2d 1370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
the court observed as follows: "A credit for a purchaser's use of a product may be proper in certain instances, even in favor of a bad faith seller.
Paul M. Davison, Etc. v. Lt Brown, Etc. 364 So. 2d 583 La. 1978
White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc. 362 So. 2d 1116 La. 1978
It is ordered that the case be remanded to the Third Circuit Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of Alexander v. Burroughs Corp., La., .
White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc. 362 So. 2d 1117 La. 1978
It is ordered that the case be remanded to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of Alexander v. Burroughs Corp., La., .
White v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc. 360 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Louisiana Supreme Court Docket No. 61106 (1978), the court, although concluding that in matters of contract seven per cent per annum interest, unless otherwise stipulated, on a damage award is due from the moment of an active violation of a contract or from the time the debtor has been put in default when the breach

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by