Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Drew, 360 So. 2d 500.
-
Moresi v. STATE, DEPT. OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES
552 So. 2d 1259
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142 (1964)
- State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- State v. Guillory 544 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
State v. Lindsey
543 So. 2d 886
La. 1989
This court concluded in State v. Andrews, 369 So.2d at 1050 , (), that "the rule concerning the introduction of demonstrative evidence is that the foundation laid must establish that it is more probable than not that the evidence is connected with the case and that the evidence has some relevance which the trial court considers sufficient to warrant its introduction."
- State v. Chavis 542 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. Harris 540 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- State v. French 538 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- State v. Rexrode 536 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. White 535 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Clark 529 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Baker 528 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
- State v. Bryant 521 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
-
State Ex Rel. Cockerham v. Butler
515 So. 2d 1134
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
and State v. Parker, supra.
-
State v. Quinn
517 So. 2d 964
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
The Louisiana Supreme Court, established the scope of the res gestae doctrine and stated: “...
- State v. Price 517 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Poydras 514 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Evans 512 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Francosi 511 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
- State v. Narcisse 512 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- State v. Taylor 508 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. White 508 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
Kabir v. City of Lafayette
509 So. 2d 464
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
” In the present case we find that the trial court committed manifest error in concluding that the police officers did not have reasonable cause to believe plaintiff had committed an offense.
- State v. Mims 505 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Huber 504 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
- State v. Ourso 502 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
- State v. Mims 501 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
- State v. Williams 497 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
- State v. Yochim 496 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- State v. Green 493 So. 2d 1178 La. 1986
-
State v. Smith
491 So. 2d 641
La. 1986
State v. Allen, supra ; (La.
- State v. Bell 488 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
-
State v. Graham
486 So. 2d 1139
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
State v. Richey, 258 La.1094, (1971); writ denied, 464 U.S. 1005 , 104 S.Ct.
- State v. Lambertus 482 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
- State v. Holbrook 476 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
State v. Buie
477 So. 2d 157
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
stated the following: Defendant had ample opportunity to extensively cross-examine the victim, a sufficient remedy to any suggestion inherent in the in-court identification process.
- State v. Gardner 476 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Jarreau 476 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
-
State v. Long
473 So. 2d 901
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
” A continuous chain of evidence is not essential.
- State v. Macaluso 473 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. King 471 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- State v. Coleman 470 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Kirkley 470 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Cordell v. Briley 469 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- State v. Gultry 471 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
- State v. Nance 469 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
- State v. Shepard 468 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
State v. Simpson
464 So. 2d 1104
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
-19 (La.1978)' -51 (La.1979)."
- State v. Abram 465 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
State v. Santee
464 So. 2d 922
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
232 , 66 L.Ed.2d 106 (1980); cert denied, 439 U.S. 1059 , 99 S.Ct.