Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 359 So. 2d 137.

72 citing documents.

State v. Dokes 398 So. 2d 1025 La. 1981
State v. Morris 397 So. 2d 1237 La. 1981
State v. Veals 392 So. 2d 646 La. 1981
State v. Molinet 393 So. 2d 721 La. 1981
State v. LaFleur 391 So. 2d 445 La. 1980
State v. Jones 386 So. 2d 85 La. 1980
State v. Kenner 384 So. 2d 413 La. 1980
State, in Interest of Brown 385 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
State v. Delore 381 So. 2d 455 La. 1980
State v. Voelkel 377 So. 2d 1204 La. 1979
State v. Touchet 372 So. 2d 1184 La. 1979
State v. Jacobs 371 So. 2d 727 La. 1979
State v. Gist 369 So. 2d 1339 La. 1979
State v. Cox 369 So. 2d 118 La. 1979
State v. Huckaby 368 So. 2d 1059 La. 1979
State v. Sepulvado 367 So. 2d 762 La. 1979
State v. Hopkins 367 So. 2d 346 La. 1979
State v. Roper 364 So. 2d 1308 La. 1978
State v. Gordon 364 So. 2d 1036 La. 1978
It is further provided that the “court shall state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis therefor in imposing sentence.”
State v. Savoie 363 So. 2d 902 La. 1978
State v. Jackson 360 So. 2d 842 La. 1978
See State v. Sepulvado, La., (No. 61,216, 1978).
State v. Scarborough 359 So. 2d 982 La. 1978
(1978), where an apparently excessive sentence was imposed without a recitation by the sentencing judge of the considerations and factual basis upon which he relied, we vacate these sentences and we remand these cases to the trial court, with instructions that it re-sentence the defendant in compliance with La.C.Cr.P.