Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State in Interest of Dino, 359 So. 2d 586.

114 citing documents.

State ex rel. Collum 368 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In our first opinion we applied the holding of State, In the Interest of Dino, that a juvenile could not waive his constitutional right against self-incrimination without consulting an attorney or an adult both interested in the juvenile’s welfare and fully advised of the juvenile’s rights.
State ex rel. Joiner 365 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
On appeal McManus and Joiner assign the following two specifications of error: (1) Gene McManus’ inculpatory statement should not have been admitted into evidence, as doing so violated the principles set forth by the Louisiana Supreme Court in State in the Interest of Dino, and, (2) The state failed to establish a prima facie case that the defendants had been hunting in violation of LSA-R.S.
State v. Mouton 366 So. 2d 1336 La. 1978
State of Louisiana in the Interest of Dino
State v. Siegel 366 So. 2d 1358 La. 1978
Defense further relies on State in the Interest of Dino, where this court found that it is well settled under Miranda and our state constitution that if a statement is taken without the presence of an attorney, under circumstances in which the warnings are required, a heavy burden rests on the state to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently wa
State v. Beavers 364 So. 2d 1004 La. 1978
1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968)
State ex rel. McConnell 364 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
State in Interest of Dino
State ex rel. Collum 364 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
In the case of State, In the Interest of Dino, the court said: “.
State in Interest of Causey 363 So. 2d 472 La. 1978
The same approach was adopted by a majority of this court in determining which due process rights are guaranteed to juveniles by the Louisiana Constitution, in State in Interest of Dino
State ex rel. Coco 363 So. 2d 207 La. 1978
State in the Interest of Dino
State v. Burge 362 So. 2d 1371 La. 1978
State, in the Interest of Dino, La., (1978).
State ex rel. Jones 367 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
1st Cir. 1978) was on July 3, 1978 reversed by the Louisiana Supreme Court, and remanded for reconsideration in light of State in Interest of Dino
State ex rel. Giangrosso 361 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
This argument assumes greater force with the recent events which have occurred in the area of juvenile law, namely, the handing down of the recent Supreme Court decision Number 61, 282, State of Louisiana, In the Interest of Andrew Leonard Dino [ ] and the introduction of House Bill number 288 in the regular 1978 legislative session.
State v. Kent 360 So. 2d 1180 La. 1978
The case is remanded for further proceedings in the light of In re Dino, La., .
State ex rel. Jones 360 So. 2d 1181 La. 1978
Judgment of Court of Appeal is reversed and case is remanded to Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of State v. Dino, La., .