Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wagster, 361 So. 2d 849.

46 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Brennen D. Lark La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
6/1/07), (observing that, “[a]s a general rule, counsel’s failure to obtain a ruling on the merits would constitute an abandonment of the motion”); (La.
State v. Broussard 269 So. 3d 1094 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Other cases further reflect the correctness of this position, including State v. Wagster , cited by the courts in Williams and in Washington .
State of Louisiana v. Damon Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Other cases further reflect the correctness of this position, cited by the courts in Williams and in Washington.
State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Wagster , , 856 (La.
State v. Hutsell 241 So. 3d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2018
6/1/07), , 134 ( , 856 (La.1978) this Court noted: "As a general rule, counsel's failure to obtain a ruling on the merits would constitute an abandonment of the motion."
State of Louisiana v. Corlious C. Dyson AKA Corlious Corall Dyson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Therefore, : “ * * * (Q)uestioning of witnesses in a criminal jury trial by the judge is a practice to be avoided unless deemed indispensible to a fair and impartial trial.
State v. Dyson 220 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Therefore, : “ * * * (Q)uestioning of witnesses in a criminal jury trial by the judge is a practice to be avoided unless deemed indispensible to a fair and impartial trial.
State v. Vernon 207 So. 3d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Otherwise it may be considered that the motion has been abandoned.” Id., (La.
State v. Lavy 142 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Carter, 96-0337, p. 7 (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Robert James Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Therefore, : “ * * * (Q)uestioning of witnesses in a criminal jury trial by the judge is a practice to be avoided unless deemed indispensible to a fair and impartial trial.
State v. Thomas 114 So. 3d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Therefore, : “ * * * (Q)uestioning of witnesses in a criminal jury trial by the judge is a practice to be avoided unless deemed indispensible to a fair and impartial trial.
State v. Austin 99 So. 3d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. FUGLER 45 So. 3d 1060 La. 2010
See, ("[I]t is ordinarily incumbent upon the proponent of a motion to move for a hearing date on that motion.
State v. Fugler 45 So. 3d 1060 La. 2010
See, (“[I]t is ordinarily incumbent upon the proponent of a motion to move for a hearing date on that motion.
State v. Cosie 44 So. 3d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Robert Allen Snelling La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Snelling 36 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
” In Wagster , the issue was whether the father and owner of the residence could consent to the search of his son’s van, which was parked in the backyard.
State v. Harper 970 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
State v. Walton 957 So. 2d 133 La. 2007
State v. Moses 932 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Therefore, : "* * * (Q)uestioning of witnesses in a criminal jury trial by the judge is a practice to be avoided unless deemed indispensible to a fair and impartial trial.
State v. Fish 926 So. 2d 493 La. 2006
("[I]t is ordinarily incumbent upon the proponent of a motion to move for a hearing date on that motion.
State v. Cambre 902 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
1385 , 67 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981); State v. Wagster, *484
State v. Maten 899 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State of Louisiana v. Kenry James Lewis La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
State v. Lewis 878 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
State v. Zapata 713 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); (La.App.
State v. Carter 684 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Isaacs 658 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974); (La.App.
State v. Watkins 621 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
quoting United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 , 94 S.Ct.
State v. Williams 618 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Sanders 618 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Williams 610 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Martin 543 So. 2d 1020 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Accordingly, absent a written motion for continuance
State v. Griffin 540 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Coates 509 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Wilson v. Travelers Insurance Co. 476 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Henson v. Copeland, supra.
State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Henson v. Copeland 451 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Hudson 404 So. 2d 460 La. 1981
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974)
State v. Jones 395 So. 2d 751 La. 1981
State v. Bodley 394 So. 2d 584 La. 1981
2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)
State v. Packard 389 So. 2d 56 La. 1980
State v. Dye 384 So. 2d 420 La. 1980
State v. Williams 375 So. 2d 1379 La. 1979
Therefore, : "* * * [Q]uestioning of witnesses in a criminal jury trial by the judge is a practice to be avoided unless deemed indispensible to a fair and impartial trial.
State v. Wilkerson 367 So. 2d 319 La. 1979
988 , 39 L.Ed.2d 242 (1974)
State v. Stovall 363 So. 2d 658 La. 1978