Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Guzman, 362 So. 2d 744.

63 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Terrell Michael Williams And Rico Jones La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
  • State of Louisiana v. Arijoray Lavon Copeland La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    As warrantless searches are per se unreasonable, Coolidge vs. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S. Ct. 2022, 29 L. Ed. 2d 564 (1971), (La.
  • State v. Meyers 100 So. 3d 938 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (La.1978); See State v. Thompson, 02-0333 p. 10 (La.4/9/03), -38 .
  • State v. Neville 986 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Thompson 842 So. 2d 330 La. 2003
    Goins v. Walmart Stores, Inc., 01-1136 (La.2001), ; State v. Redfearn, *336
  • State v. Wood 793 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Barlow 792 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Explaining the exigent circumstances that exist in such a situation, the court stated: No constitutional distinction exists “ ‘between on the one hand seizing and holding a car before presenting the probable cause issue to a magistrate and on the other hand carrying out an immediate search without a warrant.’ ” (quoting Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 -52, 90 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lopez 772 So. 2d 90 La. 2000
    No constitutional distinction exists "`between on the one hand seizing and holding a car before presenting the probable cause issue to a magistrate and on the other hand carrying out an immediate search without a warrant.'" (quoting Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52 , 90 S.Ct.
  • State v. Brooks 756 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
  • State v. Robinson 743 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. President 715 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Paggett 684 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); (La.
  • State v. Dillon 670 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • State v. Scull 639 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Lampton 631 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Davis 612 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Bouie 598 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Laviolette 576 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
  • State v. Wright 562 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
  • State v. Cohen 549 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); cert.
  • State v. Duncan 527 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    State v. Chaney, supra; (La.
  • State v. Guzman 520 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Jackson 517 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Wilson 520 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. White 512 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Elias 509 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); cert.
  • State v. Parker 506 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
    cert den., Guzman v. Louisiana, 443 U.S. 912 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Colvin 494 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    State v. Chaney, supra; (La.
  • State v. Lowe 485 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    23 , 27 L.Ed.2d 94 (1970); cert.
  • State v. Green 482 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); cert.
  • State v. Macaluso 473 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Holmes 467 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); cert.
  • State v. Taylor 468 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    Coolidge v. New Hampshire, supra; cert.
  • State v. Tatum 466 So. 2d 29 La. 1985
  • State v. Smith 463 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Franklin 449 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Also decided before Ross and Brooks , cert.
  • State v. Duperon 448 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    Chambers v. Maroney, supra
  • State v. Oliver 448 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Redfearn 441 So. 2d 200 La. 1983
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. LeCompte 441 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    Based on Carroll and it's progeny, set out the two conditions that must be satisfied before a warrantless search of a vehicle is authorized: "(1) there must be probable cause to believe that the vehicle contained contraband or evidence of a crime; and (2) there must be `exigent circumstances' requiring an immediate warrantless search, i.e., t
  • State v. Kibodeaux 435 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970); cert.
  • State v. Chaney 423 So. 2d 1092 La. 1982
    1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1971)
  • State v. Williams 420 So. 2d 1116 La. 1982
  • State v. McCabe 420 So. 2d 955 La. 1982
  • State v. Parker 421 So. 2d 834 La. 1982
    at 748 (La.1978), this Court assessed the United States Supreme Court decisions concerning this exception to the warrant requirement.
  • State v. Cunningham 412 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Davis 411 So. 2d 434 La. 1982
  • State v. Littleton 407 So. 2d 1208 La. 1981
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Rodriguez 396 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
    329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959)