Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Jackson, 360 So. 2d 842.
- State v. Thomas 432 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Edwards 432 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Jackson 432 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Lang 430 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Marchese 430 So. 2d 1303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Lewis 430 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Williams 431 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Robinson
431 So. 2d 104
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
the Louisiana Supreme Court listed the general types of factors which should be reviewed before the court determines that a particular sentence in consideration should be applied to a particular offender.
- State v. Cruz 430 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Tully 430 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Guidry 428 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Shelton 428 So. 2d 1175 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
- State v. Nash 427 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Lane 427 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Roberts 427 So. 2d 1300 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Pike 426 So. 2d 1329 La. 1983
- State v. McClain 426 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- State v. Telsee 425 So. 2d 1251 La. 1983
- State v. Robinson 423 So. 2d 1053 La. 1982
- State v. Quebedeaux 424 So. 2d 1009 La. 1982
- State v. Knox 425 So. 2d 707 La. 1982
- State v. Roubique 421 So. 2d 859 La. 1982
- State v. Pearson 425 So. 2d 704 La. 1982
- State v. Lanclos 419 So. 2d 475 La. 1982
- State v. Lewis 416 So. 2d 921 La. 1982
-
State v. Schaeffer
414 So. 2d 730
La. 1982
we held that a trial judge is required to state for the record both the considerations he has taken into account and the factual basis for the imposition of sentence.
- State v. Wimberly 414 So. 2d 666 La. 1982
-
State v. Trahan
412 So. 2d 1294
La. 1982
State v. Jones, supra; (La.
- State v. Simms 410 So. 2d 1040 La. 1982
- State v. Crawford 410 So. 2d 1076 La. 1982
- State v. Veals 407 So. 2d 675 La. 1981
- State v. Cupit 408 So. 2d 1108 La. 1981
- State v. Ezernack 408 So. 2d 907 La. 1981
- State v. Bourgeois 406 So. 2d 550 La. 1981
- State v. Kersey 406 So. 2d 555 La. 1981
- State v. Dunns 404 So. 2d 1235 La. 1981
- State v. Rogers 405 So. 2d 829 La. 1981
- State v. Guillory 404 So. 2d 453 La. 1981
- State v. Campbell 404 So. 2d 1205 La. 1981
- State v. Telsee 404 So. 2d 921 La. 1981
- State v. Price 403 So. 2d 660 La. 1981
- State v. Jones 398 So. 2d 1049 La. 1981
- State v. Dokes 398 So. 2d 1025 La. 1981
- State v. Williams 396 So. 2d 296 La. 1981
- State v. Veals 392 So. 2d 646 La. 1981
-
State v. Saunders
393 So. 2d 1278
La. 1981
the Codal sentencing article [C.Cr.P.
- State v. Fields 394 So. 2d 597 La. 1981
-
State v. Molinet
393 So. 2d 721
La. 1981
State v. Sepulvado, supra
- State v. Green 390 So. 2d 1253 La. 1980
- State v. LaFleur 391 So. 2d 445 La. 1980