Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mason v. Norton, 360 So. 2d 178.
-
Mark Allan Atkins v. C B & I, LLC
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
we stated that these statutes are designed to compel prompt payment of wages upon an employee’s discharge or resignation.
-
Pat Cooper v. Lafayette Parish School Board
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
found that the phrase ―‗by the day, week or month‘‖ in LSA-R.S.
-
Robert Porbeck v. Industrial Chemicals, Limited
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
we stated that these statutes are designed to compel prompt payment of wages upon an employee‟s discharge or resignation.
-
Porbeck v. Industrial Chemicals (US) Ltd.
134 So. 3d 234
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
we stated that these statutes are designed to compel prompt payment of wages upon an employee’s discharge or resignation.
-
Chapman v. Ebeling
945 So. 2d 222
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Boudreaux v. Hamilton Medical Group, Inc., 94-0879 (La.10/17/94)
-
Wyatt v. Avoyelles Parish School Bd.
831 So. 2d 906
La. 2002
Boudreaux v. Hamilton Medical Group, Inc., 94-0879 (La.10/17/94), ().
-
Beard v. Summit Institute
707 So. 2d 1233
La. 1998
Boudreaux v. Hamilton Medical Group, Inc., 94-0879 (La.10/17/94)
- Thomas v. ORLEANS PRIV. INDUSTRY COUNCIL, INC. 669 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
-
Boudreaux v. Hamilton Medical Group
644 So. 2d 619
La. 1994
we stated that these statutes are designed to compel prompt payment of wages upon an employee's discharge or resignation.
- Guidry v. Anderson-Dunham, Inc. 597 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
- Franklin v. Ram, Inc.(Of Arkansas) 576 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
- Pearce v. Austin 465 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
-
Morris v. Parish Radio Service Co., Inc.
444 So. 2d 162
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
discussed the Gatti case and other court of appeal decisions.
- Keith v. Little 434 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
Alexander v. American Food Management
424 So. 2d 1246
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
The Supreme Court discusses the Gatti
-
Bartlett v. DOCTORS HOSP. OF TIOGA
422 So. 2d 660
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
found that the phrase "`by the day, week, or month'" in LSA-R.S.
- Singleton v. Gulf Coast Truck Service, Inc. 409 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
-
Soday v. Mall Snacks, Inc.
374 So. 2d 138
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
689 , (1944); Robertson v. International Motor Company of Houma, Inc., (La.App.
-
Galata v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
368 So. 2d 1243
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Mason v. Norton, La.1978, , holds the statute applicable to hourly wage earners who are paid “by the day, week or month” (with a possible exception of employees who do “piece work,” as in Gros v. LeBlanc, La.App.
-
Lawrence v. Jones
367 So. 2d 1198
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Since the lodging of this appeal, (1978).