Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Boen, 362 So. 2d 519.

14 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
In State v. Boen, the Court stated: “The [i]ntelligent exercise of the right of rejection, by use of those twelve peremptory challenges, is the meat of the privilege, and can be substantially weakened by a restriction of questions the answers to which might be regarded as informative of a juror’s attitude and therefore of vital importance to his defense.” (La.
State v. Dyer 682 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the Supreme Court held the trial court committed reversible error in not permitting inquiry during voir dire examination into relations between prospective jurors and police officers.
State v. Thomas 680 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Jackson, 358 So.2d at 1267 .
State v. Stacy 665 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
(reversed conviction based on improper denial of voir dire examination into prospective jurors' attitudes toward defendant's right against self-incrimination); (reversed conviction based on improper denial of voir dire examination into relationship between prospective jurors and police officers); (La.App.
State v. Allen 633 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed a conviction because the trial court improperly restricted defense counsel's voir dire examination on the subject of relations between prospective jurors and police officers.
State v. Hall 616 So. 2d 664 La. 1993
State v. Jackson, 358 So.2d at 1267 .
State v. Jarreau 476 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Williams 457 So. 2d 610 La. 1984
State v. David 425 So. 2d 1241 La. 1983
The accused's right to "full voir dire examination" includes the right to make such inquiries of prospective jurors as will enable him to secure his constitutional rights, not only by showing grounds for challenges for cause, but also by eliciting facts which will empower him intelligently to exercise his right of peremptory challenge, and the right to examine a prospective juror challenged for cause by the prosecution in order to demonstrate his impartiality.
State v. Frith 412 So. 2d 1000 La. 1982
State v. St. Amant 413 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
State v. Claiborne 397 So. 2d 486 La. 1981
uisiana Constitution, this court has held that the accused's right to "full voir dire examination" includes the right to make such inquiries of prospective jurors as will enable him to secure his constitutional rights, not only by showing grounds for challenges for cause, but also by eliciting facts which will empower him intelligently to exercise his right of peremptory challenge, (La.
State v. Dixon 365 So. 2d 1310 La. 1978
State v. Hayes 364 So. 2d 923 La. 1978