DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Eames, 365 So. 2d 1361.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Barnett 118 So. 3d 1156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    14:27); (wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that there is no such thing as an attempt to incite a riot, citing the comments to La.
  • State v. DEW 968 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Joshlin 804 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    14:27, may not be employed when the definition of an offense includes the attempt to do something
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    explained: An attempt is an inchoate offense.
  • State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    explained: An attempt is an inchoate offense.
  • State v. Presley 758 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    When addressing a similar issue, explained: If the definition of another crime includes the attempt to do something, the attempt statute, R.S.
  • State v. Sloan 747 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    the supreme court stated: An attempt is an inchoate offense.
  • State v. Campbell 670 So. 2d 1212 La. 1996
    (if "the nature of the offense is such that proof of the attempted offense proves the substantive offense," attempt is not responsive to the charged offense); (La.
  • State v. Campbell 657 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    which states: If the definition of another crime includes attempt to do something, the attempt statute, R.S.
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
    1981) ("inciting to riot" and "participating in a riot" are separate offenses); ( Id ).
  • State v. Williams 545 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
    See also Justice Dennis' concurring opinion (in which he was joined by Justices Tate and Calogero) -71 (La.1978).
  • State v. Walker 534 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    at page 1363 (La.1978), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: "An attempt is an inchoate offense.
  • State v. Mims 524 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Thompson 516 So. 2d 349 La. 1987
    Const. art. I, § 3; -73 (La.1979) (concurring opinion), the conviction and sentence should be reversed; if the challenges are found proper, the temporary affirmance may be made permanent after further review by this court.
  • State v. Mims 505 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Ford 489 So. 2d 1250 La. 1986
  • State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    [8] in which he concluded the prosecutor's use of peremptory challenges to exclude blacks (from a jury including one black juror) is prohibited under Article I, § 3 of the Louisiana Constitution.
  • State v. Stevens 452 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
  • State v. Walters 440 So. 2d 115 La. 1983
    in which this court found that the Legislature in defining "inciting to riot" did not intend for the general attempt statute to apply to such offense, because the "incitement" was itself in the nature of an attempt.
  • State v. Parker 421 So. 2d 834 La. 1982
    Const, art. I § 3; State v. Perry, (Dennis, J., dissenting) (1982); *843 (Dennis, J., concurring).
  • State v. West 419 So. 2d 868 La. 1982
  • State v. Middlebrook 409 So. 2d 588 La. 1982
    Defendant asserts that he should not be required to show systematic exclusion of blacks over a period of time and that the mere fact that five of the six peremptory challenges used by the state were used to exclude blacks is sufficient, (La.
  • State v. Edwards 406 So. 2d 1331 La. 1981
  • State v. Beavers 394 So. 2d 1218 La. 1981
  • State v. Prejean 379 So. 2d 240 La. 1980
    (Dennis, J., concurring); (Dennis, J., concurring).
  • State v. Allen 380 So. 2d 28 La. 1980
    (Dennis, J., concurring).
  • State v. Brown 371 So. 2d 751 La. 1979
    Heretofore, less than a (La.