Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marchand, 362 So. 2d 1090.

45 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Prince Record La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
State v. Record 266 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
654 (1954) ; State v. Marchand , , 1092 (La.1978).
State v. Broadway 252 So. 3d 878 La. 2018
1981) ; State v. Marchand , (La.
State ex rel. Craddock v. State 225 So. 3d 452 La. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Hernandez 177 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2015
546, 549 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965); -93 (La.1978).
State of Louisiana v. Jason Allen Lomax La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Remmer v. U. S., 347 U.S. 227, 229, 74 S.Ct.
State v. Turner 57 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
546 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965)
State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. 9 Parker, [] supra; (La.
State v. Brown 943 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
State v. Parker, supra [ ]
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
1979); -87 (La.1981) (presumption of prejudice when jurors consulted a superseded law book during deliberations); (presumption of prejudice when bailiff communicated prejudicial information to jurors).
State v. Gatti 914 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Videau 900 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
654 (1954); State v. Collins, supra .
State v. Collins 833 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
546, 549 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965); -1093 (La.1978).
State v. McKinsey 779 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
546, 549 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965); *999 -1093 (La.1978).
State v. Clark 732 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
State v. Bibb, supra ; (La.App.
State v. Allen 707 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Owens v. Concordia Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 699 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. McLemore 640 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
654 (1954); State v. Bibb, supra .
State v. Bourque 636 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
546, 549 , 13 L.Ed.2d 424 (1965); -1093 (La.1978).
State v. Maze 596 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
State v. Baker 582 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
1979), appeal after remand, (La.
State v. Hill 562 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990
State v. Sheehan 558 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Duplissey 550 So. 2d 590 La. 1989
State v. Guidry 496 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Remmer v. U.S., 347 U.S. 227, 229 , 74 S.Ct.
State v. Hawkins 496 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Remmer v. U.S., 347 U.S. 227, 229 , 74 S.Ct.
State v. Balfa 485 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Cantu 469 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
(Emphasis supplied) See also, appeal after remand
State v. Arnold 466 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Morris 457 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Dryer 449 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
the Supreme Court dealt with a bailiff's communication to the foreman and another member of the jury that defense counsel's objection prevented the judge from granting their request to have access to an alleged confession during deliberations.
State v. Williams 445 So. 2d 1171 La. 1984
State v. Montgomery 432 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Graham 422 So. 2d 123 La. 1982
Turner v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466 , 85 S.Ct.
Distinguished State v. Copeland 419 So. 2d 899 La. 1982
State v. Palrean 395 So. 2d 687 La. 1981
State v. Sinegal 393 So. 2d 684 La. 1981
The trial court held that the law book did not constitute an unauthorized communication or overt act, and it was unnecessary, therefore, to have an inquiry into the question of prejudice
State v. Wisham 384 So. 2d 385 La. 1980
State v. Delore 381 So. 2d 455 La. 1980
which dealt with a prejudicial communication from the bailiff to the jury prior to verdict.
State v. Charles 377 So. 2d 344 La. 1979
Remmer v. U. S., 347 U.S. 227, 229 , 74 S.Ct.
State v. Willis 371 So. 2d 1327 La. 1979
State v. Wisham 371 So. 2d 1151 La. 1979