Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Thompson, 364 So. 2d 908.

19 citing documents.

  • State v. Wheeler 644 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Washington 550 So. 2d 287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Isaac 544 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
  • State v. Bates 536 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Caillouet 496 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980); State v. Sykes, [ ] supra; (La.
  • State v. Williams 497 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    1982); State v. Humphrey, supra; State v. Flores, 169 La.
  • State v. Bertrand 461 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    —eight year old third grade boy had sufficient understanding to testify; — eight year old girl had sufficient understanding to testify; —seven year old boy at the time of the crime occurrence and nine years old at the time of t
  • State v. Armstrong 453 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    State v. Humphrey, supra; (La.
  • State v. Foy 439 So. 2d 433 La. 1983
  • State v. Anderson 440 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
    2214 , 65 L.Ed.2d 159 (1980); State v. Sykes, supra
  • State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
    [eight year old third grade boy had sufficient understanding to testify]; [eight year old girl had sufficient understanding to testify]; [seven year old boy at time of crime occurrence and nine years old at time of trial
  • State v. Humphrey 412 So. 2d 507 La. 1982
  • State v. Talbot 408 So. 2d 861 La. 1981
  • State v. Martin 400 So. 2d 1063 La. 1981
  • State v. Oliver 387 So. 2d 1154 La. 1980
    the facts elicited from defendant about his former convictions on minor charges actually minimized the nature of those crimes.
  • State v. Skipper 387 So. 2d 592 La. 1980
  • State v. Brown 371 So. 2d 746 La. 1979