Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite LeJeune v. Allstate Ins. Co., 365 So. 2d 471.

138 citing documents.

Richard and Patricia Pannell v. the City of Scott La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Katty Calderon, Natural Mother of the Decedent, Avril Sanabria Versus Lezly Sanabria, Suly Sanabria, Jonathan Rivera, Abc Insurance … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Kirk D. Parker v. Recreation & Park Commission for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, and Parish of … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Thelma Lewis v. Safeway Insurance Company of Louisiana, Corey Campbell, Zane Campbell and Sheriff Jerry Larpenter, in his … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality v. Tidewater Landfill LLC & the Louisiana Fruit Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Brandon S. Wise Indv. and Obo Drey Domone Wise v. George O'Neil and Antoinette O'Neil La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Khiry Cosey on Behalf of Her Minor Children, Corbin Hilliard and Allyssa Hilliard Individually and on Behalf of … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Carter v. Pointe Coupee Parish Sch. Board 268 So. 3d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Knoten v. Westbrook 193 So. 3d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Roberts v. Rudzis 146 So. 3d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., the court, in describing the substantial factor test, stated that “one must consider whether the actor’s conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm.” Perkins v. Entergy Corp., 00-1372 (La.3/23/01), .
Rodriguez v. Walters 136 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Co., (quoting Restatement of Torts, 2d, Section 433(b)).
Felicia Clement v. Scott A. Citron La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Clement v. Citron 115 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Grimes v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 29 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The "one master" rule, however, in favor of finding both the general employer and the special employer solidarity liable to third parties injured by the negligence of the borrowed employee.
Allums v. Parish of Lincoln 15 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Co., the court, in describing the substantial factor test, stated that "one must consider whether the actor's conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm."
Lewis v. Jabbar 5 So. 3d 250 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., in which a deputy sheriff negligently failed to secure an intersection during a funeral procession, resulting in an automobile accident that killed a passenger in the hearse.
Wanda Batiste v. Farm Bureau La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The duty of the sheriff’s department when called into service to provide an escort for a as follows: Deputy Smith’s duty was to do what was necessary to ensure that the funeral cortege could pass safely through the intersection, despite the automatic signals that designated Highway 10 the road the cortege had to cross as the favored highway.
Batiste v. Farm Bureau 982 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
The duty of the sheriff's department when called into service to provide an escort for a as follows: Deputy Smith's duty was to do what was necessary to ensure that the funeral cortege could pass safely through the intersection, despite the automatic signals that designated Highway 10 the road the cortege had to cross as the favored highway.
LeCroy v. Interim Health Care Staffing 980 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Co., we addressed the issue of whether the general employer of a negligent employee remained liable for its employee's tort despite the fact that the employee had been borrowed to perform services for a special employer at the time of an accident.
Geneva Vidrine v. Jason Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Carter v. City Parish Govt., supra; McKenzie & Johnson, supra.
Vidrine v. LaFleur 979 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Carter v. City Parish Govt., supra; McKenzie & Johnson, supra.
McCain v. Howell 971 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Co., the court, in describing the substantial factor test, stated that "one must consider whether the actor's conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm."
Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 947 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Co., , quoting Restatement of Torts, 2d, Section 433(b).
Andry v. Murphy Oil, USA, Inc. 935 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Co., the court, in describing the substantial factor test, stated that "one must consider whether the actor's conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm."
Earline Alleman v. Belinda M. Romero La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Similarly, the supreme court determined that an officer who failed to secure an intersection as a funeral cortege passed through was negligent and his negligence was a cause-in-fact of the ensuing accident.
Alleman v. Romero 931 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Howell v. Ferry Transp., Inc. 929 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Otwell v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 914 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Distinguished Leaming v. Century Vina, Inc. 908 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 877 So. 2d 89 La. 2004
Bouakhay Siripanyo v. Allstate Indemnity Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
imposes a duty on police officers to do what is necessary to ensure a funeral procession safely passes through intersections.
Siripanyo v. Allstate Indem. Co. 862 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
imposes a duty on police, officers to do what is necessary to ensure a funeral procession safely passes through intersections.
Bonin v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 855 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
App. 1 Cir.1992), and Seals v. Morris , (La.
Dingler v. ZURICH COMMERICAL INS. CO. 833 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Arcadian Corp. v. Olin Corp. 824 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Co., the court, in describing the substantial factor test, stated that "one must consider whether the actor's conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm."
Ott v. LPK Systems, Inc. 812 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 782 So. 2d 606 La. 2001
Co., the court, in describing the substantial factor test, stated that "one must consider whether the actor's conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm."
Fleniken v. Entergy Corp. 790 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Guilliams v. Succession of Harrel 774 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Schmidt v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield 769 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Borden, Inc. v. Howard Trucking Co., Inc.
Cole v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Cole v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Turner v. Moore 752 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
As to the merits, the majority ignores a
Gumpert v. Pittman Const. Co., Inc. 736 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Co., and found that the general employer and the special employer may be held solidarily liable for the torts of the borrowed employee.
Thomas v. Gallant Ins. Co. 733 So. 2d 1236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Edwards v. Daugherty 729 So. 2d 1112 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Dyer v. Service Marine Industries, Inc. 723 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Melancon v. City of Lafayette 719 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Daye v. General Motors Corp. 720 So. 2d 654 La. 1998
Co., Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.