Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Leggett, 363 So. 2d 434.
- State of Louisiana v. Gladue Joseph Istre A/K/A Joey Istre La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
- State of Louisiana Versus Mahlon R. Norton, III La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
- State of Louisiana v. Harrison J. Bethley La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
-
State of Louisiana Versus Ryk Frickey
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
enroll as defendant’s “counsel of choice.” The record shows that Mr. McMahon attempted to enroll two weeks prior to the scheduled jury trial, even though defendant had approximately ten months to retain private counsel.15 The record also shows that defendant’s jury trial had been set 15 See Divine, supra (the defendant had approximately two months to retain counsel); (La.
-
State Of Louisiana v. Tyrone D. Johnson
La. 2020
1979); State v. Leggett, [ (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Tyrone D. Johnson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
-
State v. Roth
260 So. 3d 1230
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Const. art. I, § 13 ; State v. Leggett , (La.
-
State v. Hicks
258 So. 3d 1031
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
State v. Leggett , , 436 (La.
-
State v. Saulsberry
247 So. 3d 1137
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
Const. art. I, § 13 ; State v. Leggett , (La.
- State v. Cooley 247 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
-
State v. Thomas
223 So. 3d 759
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Const. art. I, § 13; (La.
- State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
- State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
- State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Skylar Frank La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
- State v. Frank 192 So. 3d 888 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
-
State v. Hampton
195 So. 3d 548
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
A. request for new or privately retained counsel during criminal proceedings may be done via a motion for continuance.
- State v. Kennon 194 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
-
State v. Murray
161 So. 3d 918
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
State v. Reeves, 2006-2419 (La.5/5/09), ; State v. Wilson, 45,060 (La.App.2d Cir.3/10/10), .
-
State v. Phillips
130 So. 3d 416
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the dangerous weapon test was met where the weapon used was an “air pistol or pellet pistol” which could possibly kill or cause great bodily harm.
-
State v. Pierre
131 So. 3d 319
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
In reaching our holding in Divine, we relied upon the Louisiana Supreme Court’s
-
State v. Ventris
79 So. 3d 1108
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“Absent a justifiable basis, ‘[t]here is no constitutional right to make a new choice of counsel on the very date the trial is to begin, with the attendant necessity of a continuance and its disrupting implications.’” Bridgewater, 00-1529 at 20-21, 823 So.2d at 896 ().
- State v. LeBlanc 76 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-
State v. Lewis
69 So. 3d 604
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
State v. Reeves, 2006-2419 (La.5/5/09), ; State v. Wilson, 45,060 (La.App.2d Cir.3/10/10), .
- State v. Nickles 60 So. 3d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
-
State v. Shannon
61 So. 3d 706
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“There is no constitutional right to make a new choice of counsel on the very date the trial is to begin, with the attendant necessity of a continuance and its disrupting implications to the orderly trial of cases.”
-
Hebert v. Hebert
30 So. 3d 1186
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
State v. Champion, supra at 1050 ; State v. Johnson, supra at 1304 ; State v. Lee, supra at 1028
- State v. Wilson 32 So. 3d 1152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
- State v. Wilson 30 So. 3d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Reeves 11 So. 3d 1031 La. 2009
- State v. Stubbs 999 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
- State v. Champ 991 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
- State v. Burbank 971 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2007
- State of Louisiana v. Ivory L. Simon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
- State v. Leger 936 So. 2d 108 La. 2006
- State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
- State v. Moore 920 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
- State v. Shumaker 914 So. 2d 1156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- State v. Lewis 892 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
- State v. Jackson 889 So. 2d 1071 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
- State of Louisiana v. John M. Benedict La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Benedict 887 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- State v. Tate 880 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
- State v. Dilosa 849 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
State v. Lookadoo
847 So. 2d 645
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
“There is no constitutional right to make a new choice of counsel on the very date trial is to begin, with the attendant necessity of a continuance and its disrupting implications.”
- State v. MacCracken 845 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Marshall 843 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
-
State v. Wilson
833 So. 2d 560
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
3 Cir. 11/2/00), , we noted: Both the federal and state constitutions provide that the accused has the right to counsel of his own choosing to defend him on a criminal charge.
-
State v. Willis
823 So. 2d 1072
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Williams, 00-1850 (La.