Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Diliberto, 362 So. 2d 566.
- State v. Griffin 17 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-
State v. Scott
20 So. 3d 1089
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
-68 (La.1978); State v. Jackson, 94-1500, pp. 7-8 (La.App.
- State v. Coleman 713 So. 2d 440 La. 1998
-
State v. Coleman
702 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
The court further indicated “the state might properly be required to disclose the identity of the confidential informant, if it intends to produce evidence at the merit-trial of an incident at which the informant was present or in which the informant set up or participated in the crime.” Id.
-
State v. Akins
687 So. 2d 489
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
471 , (1971); State v. James, supra.
-
State v. Johnson
529 So. 2d 142
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
the government has been required to disclose the identity of an informant when the informant's actions and communications are used to establish probable cause to search, unless there is sufficient evidence, absence the informant's role, to establish probable cause, or unless there was sufficient indicia of his reliability based on past experience with the officers
-
State v. Fontenot
524 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
471 , (1971); State v. James, supra.
- State v. Buffington 452 So. 2d 1313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- State v. Mitchell 443 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
State v. Edwards
406 So. 2d 1331
La. 1981
this Court stated: When the issue is not guilt or innocence, but instead the probable cause for an arrest or search, police officers need not invariably be required to disclose an informant's identity, if the trial judge is convinced, by evidence submitted in open court and subject to cross-examination, that
- State v. Rodriguez 396 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
- State v. James 396 So. 2d 1281 La. 1981
-
State v. Matthews
382 So. 2d 917
La. 1980
Similarly, this Court, citing McCray, supra, held that “when the issue is not guilt or innocence, but instead the probable cause for an arrest or a search, police officers need not invariably be required to disclose an informant’s identity, if the trial judge is convinced, by evidence submitted in open court and subje