Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 363 So. 2d 458.

29 citing documents.

State in the Interest of C. C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
The fact that the original disposition hearing date was set beyond the thirty day time limitation, in the absence of evidence of good cause for the delay, is an issue that has been recognized by this court as an error patent: the supreme court, without determining the unreasonableness of the delay between trial and sentencing, held that since the defendant sustained no prejudice by the delay, he was not entitled to have his conviction and sentence set aside.
State ex rel. C.C. 124 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
The fact that the original disposition hearing date was set beyond the thirty day time limitation, in the absence of evidence of good cause for the delay, is an issue that has been recognized by this court as an error patent: the supreme court, without determining the unreasonableness of the delay between trial and sentencing, held that since the defendant sustained no prejudice by the delay, he was not entitled to have his conviction and sentence set aside.
State of Louisiana v. Marlon Roberson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
State v. Sims 33 So. 3d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Hicks 30 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Robinson 19 So. 3d 1206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Watkins 972 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and La.
State v. Girod 892 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
seven years elapsed between the defendant's conviction and sentence.
State v. Wilson 833 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
However, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the defendant was not prejudiced by a delay of seven years between the defendant's conviction and sentence.
State ex rel. K.G. 778 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
art. 874 clearly pointed out the probable reluctance by the supreme court to impose this harsh sanction “except in cases of extreme and clearly unjustified delay.” Consistent with this comment, the court |14noted, which declined to address the unreasonableness of the delay between trial and sentencing where the defendant had shown no prejudice.
State Ex Rel. Kg 778 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Consistent with this comment, the court noted, which declined to address the unreasonableness of the delay between trial and sentencing where the defendant had shown no prejudice.
State v. Hancock 748 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Stewart 732 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
where seven years occurred between the defendant's conviction and sentence.
State in Interest of TT 677 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Dorsey 672 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Williams 596 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Alexander, supra .
State v. McCoy 586 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Cowger 581 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
State v. Johnston, supra, at 824
City of Winnfield v. Weems 545 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Thompson 539 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Alexander, supra .
State v. Alexander 503 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971)
State v. Johnston 480 So. 2d 823 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
State v. Milson 458 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
State v. Lewis 430 So. 2d 1286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Duncan 396 So. 2d 297 La. 1981
City of Baton Rouge v. Bourgeois 380 So. 2d 63 La. 1980
State v. Muse 367 So. 2d 789 La. 1979
I. Recently, this court found that the right to be speedily sentenced is not guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment and Article I, Section 16 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.