DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Banks, 363 So. 2d 491.

27 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Rickey D. Arvie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • State v. Arvie 73 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • State v. Thompson 842 So. 2d 330 La. 2003
  • State v. Allen 762 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. Lee 637 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    a police officer arrested the defendant-motorist and placed him in the squad car.
  • State v. McHugh 630 So. 2d 1259 La. 1994
  • State v. Powell 566 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • State v. Price 495 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dorociak 493 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hale 481 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Junegain 478 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Havard 469 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Jenkins 468 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Knowles 438 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971)
  • State v. Hernandez 410 So. 2d 1381 La. 1982
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974); (La.
  • State v. Rodriguez 396 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
    the "plain view" exception to warrant requirements was explained: "In sum, the conditions necessary for the applicability of the plain view doctrine are: (1) there must be a prior justification for an intrusion into a protected area, (2) in the course of which evidence is inadvertently discovered, and (3) w
  • State v. Pittman 397 So. 2d 1297 La. 1981
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974)
  • State v. Stott 395 So. 2d 714 La. 1981
    we said: "In sum, the conditions necessary for the applicability of the plain view doctrine are: (1) there must be a prior justification for an intrusion into a protected area, (2) in the course of which evidence is inadvertently discovered, and (3) where it is immediately apparent without close inspection
  • State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
  • State v. Roberds 393 So. 2d 715 La. 1981
  • State v. Gibson 391 So. 2d 421 La. 1980
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1974)
  • State v. Reed 388 So. 2d 776 La. 1980
    2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); (La.
  • State v. Dowling 387 So. 2d 1165 La. 1980
  • State v. Pomes 376 So. 2d 133 La. 1979
  • State v. Sanders 374 So. 2d 1186 La. 1979
  • State v. LaRue 368 So. 2d 1048 La. 1979
  • State v. Koncir 367 So. 2d 365 La. 1979
    Recently, this Court repeated the well-recognized prerequisites to the application to the plain view doctrine: (1) there must be a prior justification for an intrusion into a protected area, (2) in *368 the course of which evidence is inadvertently discovered, and (3) where it is immediately apparent without clo