DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Procell, 365 So. 2d 484.

82 citing documents.

  • State v. Dugar 643 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    is satisfied that an admonition is not sufficient to assure the defendant a fair trial.'" cert.
  • State v. Ricks 637 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • State v. Williams 633 So. 2d 147 La. 1994
  • State v. Cavazos 610 So. 2d 127 La. 1992
  • State v. Gladney 577 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    243 , 93 L.Ed.2d 168 (1986); cert.
  • State v. Carroll 546 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    If the issue were properly before us these considerations might support the conclusion that the questioning constituted harmless error at worst as in State v. Procell [ ], supra.
  • State v. Messiah 538 So. 2d 175 La. 1988
    See State v. Neslo, supra at 87
  • State v. Tassin 536 So. 2d 402 La. 1988
    State v. Williams, supra
  • State v. Ealy 530 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    cert, denied 441 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Everett 530 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    102 , 70 L.Ed.2d 91 (1981); cert.
  • State v. Theard 527 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
  • State v. Carmouche 499 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the court held that the proper vehicle for objection by a defendant to this sort of testimony was a motion for mistrial and request for an admonition to the jury.
  • State v. Bell 471 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Eason 460 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    the court held that the pointing of a gun at a victim as it was fired, was evidence of a specific intent to kill.
  • State v. Palmer 447 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    certiorari denied, 441 U.S. 944 [ 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Adams 446 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    certiorari denied, 441 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Fredenburg 441 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    State v. Garner, 241 La.
  • State v. Knighton 436 So. 2d 1141 La. 1983
    1493 , 67 L.Ed.2d 622 (1981)
  • State v. Neslo 433 So. 2d 73 La. 1983
  • State v. Brogdon 426 So. 2d 158 La. 1983
  • State v. Davis 411 So. 2d 2 La. 1982
  • State v. McDermitt 406 So. 2d 195 La. 1981
  • State v. Boyer 406 So. 2d 143 La. 1981
  • State v. Motton 395 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
    State v. Sercovich, 246 La.
  • State v. Sayles 395 So. 2d 695 La. 1981
  • State v. Holmes 388 So. 2d 722 La. 1980
  • State v. Main Motors, Inc. 383 So. 2d 327 La. 1980
  • State v. Custard 384 So. 2d 428 La. 1980
  • State v. Sermon 385 So. 2d 782 La. 1980
    State v. Procell, La., , does not require a bifurcated trial if the prosecution does not seek the death penalty.
  • State v. Williams 383 So. 2d 369 La. 1980
  • State v. Morgan 367 So. 2d 779 La. 1979
    Furthermore, that assignment (five), which takes issue with the district attorney's questioning the defendant as to his failure to make an exculpatory statement after being taken into custody, has merit for reasons I expressed in State v. Procell, La., .