DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Phillips, 365 So. 2d 1304.

71 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. El Jerico Jermiah Bartie A/K/A El Jerico Bartie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
  • State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State of Louisiana v. Bishop Slade Dubroc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
  • State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
  • State v. Dubroc 261 So. 3d 832 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    See State v. Phillips , , 1309 (La.
  • State v. Young 203 So. 3d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether the defendant in that case was denied his constitutional right to a trial by jury.
  • State v. Gibson 186 So. 3d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • State v. Spurlock 175 So. 3d 955 La. 2015
  • State v. Whitley 156 So. 3d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    permitted a waiver to be made by defense counsel where the defendant was present in court and failed to object when defense counsel made the waiver.
  • State v. Morgan 134 So. 3d 1160 La. 2014
    on the contemporaneous statements of counsel on a plea waiver form because “[a]ny other holding by this Court would tend to undermine the relationship of trust that must necessarily exist between the bench and bar.”); (declining to adopt a rule requiring trial judges to inform defendants personally of the right to trial by jury); -09 (La.1978) (declining to adopt a rule barring waiver of jury trial except by defendant personally); -47 (La.1977) (declining to adopt a rule that judges must advise
  • State v. Biddy 129 So. 3d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    14 upheld a waiver by defense counsel when the defendant was present in |g1 court and failed to object when defense counsel made the waiver.
  • State of Louisiana v. Rosheed Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    As to the initial waiver, cert.
  • State v. Guillory 129 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    As to the initial waiver, cert.
  • State of Louisiana v. Ben James Thompson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Cook 82 So. 3d 1239 La. 2012
    (valid waiver of jury trial made by counsel in open court in defendant’s presence); (trial court may rely on counsel’s representation she had explained defendant’s rights to him; any other rule “would tend to undermine the relationship of trust that must nec
  • State v. Mathieu 68 So. 3d 1015 La. 2011
    (although a personal colloquy of the court with defendant is preferable, an attorney’s statement in open court that the defendant waives trial by jury may be sufficient by itself to constitute a valid waiver if the defendant is present at the time and acquiesces in that statement).
  • State v. McNair 64 So. 3d 205 La. 2011
  • State v. Dominguez 52 So. 3d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    -09 (La.1978), cert denied, 442 U.S. 919 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Scott 42 So. 3d 444 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
    cert denied, 442 U.S. 919 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Boyd 999 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State of Louisiana v. Archie Lewis Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State of Louisiana v. Lloyd Fuslier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Fuslier 954 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
  • State v. Davis 942 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
    Also see State v. Kahey, supra ; State v. Arnold, 30,282 (La.
  • State v. Thompson 848 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court specifically decided that a defense attorney could in fact waive a defendant’s right to a jury trial, stating: *709 We find no error in the determination of tbe trial judge here that the present defendant gave his informed consent to the waiver made in his presence by his attorne
  • State v. Jones 846 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether the defendant in that case was denied his constitutional right to a trial by jury.
  • State v. Santee 834 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Pierre 827 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Darbonne 787 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    [7] State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95); ; State v. Williams, 98-1146 (La.
  • State v. Dabney 772 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    82 , 107 L.Ed.2d 48 (1989); State v. Bonanno, 245 La.
  • State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
    In our discussions of vagueness, we have held, that: The statutory terms defining the crime as "unnatural carnal copulation" involving the "use of the genital organ of one of the offenders" have acquired historically and jurisprudentially a definite *505 meaning.
  • State v. Dorsey 768 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • State v. James 751 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Williams 738 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Wolfe 738 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lewis 732 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
    State v. Smith, 94-3116 (La.10/16/95)
  • State v. Smith 729 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
  • State v. Clark 735 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State v. Arnold 706 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Mandigo 702 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • State v. Nanlal 701 So. 2d 963 La. 1997
    *964 1308-09 (La.1978); State v. James, 94-0720 (La.App.
  • State v. Smith 661 So. 2d 442 La. 1995
  • State v. Sanford 660 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Baxley 656 So. 2d 973 La. 1995
  • State v. Houston 648 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
    also, State v. Richardson, supra.
  • State v. Grubbs 644 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • State v. Morris 607 So. 2d 1000 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. King 602 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
  • State v. James 576 So. 2d 611 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • State v. Richardson 575 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991