DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lecompte, 371 So. 2d 239.

48 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Anthony Nathaniel Green, Sr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    art. 651 provides: “When a defendant is tried upon a plea of ‘not guilty’, evidence of insanity or mental defect at the time of the offense shall not be admissible.” (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Clardis Edward Galloway, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
  • State v. Dressner 255 So. 3d 537 La. 2018
    See State v. Lecompte , , 243 (La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
    2050, 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985); (La.
  • State v. Adams 139 So. 3d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
  • State v. Brown 63 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    and Sosa , 05-213 at p. 7, 921 So.2d at 99 .
  • State v. Dressner 45 So. 3d 127 La. 2010
    2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985)
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    2050 , 85 L.Ed.2d 322 (1985) (no error disallowing defense questions to psychiatrist designed to show the accused's mental defect falling short of M'Naughten); (La.
  • State v. Russell 896 So. 2d 982 La. 2005
  • State v. Pitre 901 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hughes 841 So. 2d 718 La. 2003
    art. 651 ("When a defendant is tried upon a plea of `not guilty,' evidence of insanity or mental defect at the time of the offense shall not be admissible."); (La.
  • State v. Frank 803 So. 2d 1 La. 2001
    State v. Koon, 96-1208, p. 19 (La.5/20/97), ; on rehearing, (La.5/21/79).
  • State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
    215 , 112 L.Ed.2d 174 (1990)
  • State v. Koon 704 So. 2d 756 La. 1997
    -245 (La.1978); State v. Berry, supra at 825 ; State v. Rideau, 249 La.
  • State v. Dixon 668 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    we held that under art. 651, evidence of a mental condition or defect is inadmissible when the defendant failed to plead not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity ...
  • State v. Thompson 665 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    727 , 58 L.Ed.2d 708 (1978); (La.App.
  • State v. Langley 635 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • State v. Bourque 636 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    the court dealt with a case in which the defendant admitted he was sane, but he wanted to introduce psychiatric testimony about his mental history to show an absence of specific intent.
  • State v. Desselle 614 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • State v. Gachot 609 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Anseman 607 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • State v. Hurst 606 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
  • State v. Deboue 552 So. 2d 355 La. 1989
    State v. Rideau, 249 La.
  • State v. Allen 526 So. 2d 1198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. McDaniel 515 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Waymire 504 So. 2d 953 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • State v. Martin 491 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Martin 486 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    art. 651 stating: “Under this statute, evidence of a mental condition or defect is inadmissible when the defendant failed to plead not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity.
  • State v. Morton 483 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Mosely 475 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Collier 474 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Johnson 475 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the Supreme Court held, that under LSA-C.Cr.P.
  • State v. Lombard 471 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Necaise 466 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    we stated at page 243: Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 651 provides in pertinent part: "When a defendant is tried upon a plea of `not guilty', evidence of insanity or mental defect at the time of the offense shall not be admissible."
  • State v. Burton 464 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Nelson 459 So. 2d 510 La. 1984
  • State v. Brogan 453 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Porter 454 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Daigle 440 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • State v. Roussel 424 So. 2d 226 La. 1982
    we held that under art. 651, evidence of a mental condition or defect is inadmissible when the defendant failed to plead not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity.
  • State v. Graham 420 So. 2d 1126 La. 1982
  • State in Interest of Williams 421 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State v. Edwards 420 So. 2d 663 La. 1982
    we stated at page 243: Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 651 provides in pertinent part: "When a defendant is tried upon a plea of `not guilty', evidence of insanity or mental defect at the time of the offense shall not be admissible."
  • State v. Bosworth 415 So. 2d 912 La. 1982
  • State v. Leatherwood 411 So. 2d 29 La. 1982
  • State v. Belgard 410 So. 2d 720 La. 1982
  • State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
  • State v. Wade 375 So. 2d 97 La. 1979