Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Burch, 365 So. 2d 1263.
- State v. Volentine 565 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Ashworth 554 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
-
State v. Morgan
553 So. 2d 1012
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
215 , 4 L.Ed.2d 205 (1959); (La.
- State v. Stevenson 514 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Shaheen
488 So. 2d 1196
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
However, he claims that he lacked the knowledge that these materials were obscene, in that obscenity is a “legal term of art.” (La.
-
State v. Stout
470 So. 2d 581
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
2042 , 60 L.Ed.2d 402 (1979), overruled in part on other grounds by, wherein the scope of the term “ultimate sexual acts" is explored.
- State v. Davis 457 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Hudnall
444 So. 2d 644
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Wrestle, Inc., reversed on other grounds, Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130 , 99 S.Ct.
- State v. Stucke 419 So. 2d 939 La. 1982
- State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
- State v. Walters 408 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
-
State v. Echols
376 So. 2d 1244
La. 1979
and State v. Wrestle, Inc., rev'd on other grounds sub nom Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130 , 99 S.Ct.
-
State v. Short
368 So. 2d 1078
La. 1979
These contentions were rejected in, respectively, (No. 62,127), and State v. Wrestle, Inc., (La.