Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Burch, 365 So. 2d 1263.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Volentine 565 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Ashworth 554 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Morgan 553 So. 2d 1012 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    215 , 4 L.Ed.2d 205 (1959); (La.
  • State v. Stevenson 514 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Shaheen 488 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    However, he claims that he lacked the knowledge that these materials were obscene, in that obscenity is a “legal term of art.” (La.
  • State v. Stout 470 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    2042 , 60 L.Ed.2d 402 (1979), overruled in part on other grounds by, wherein the scope of the term “ultimate sexual acts" is explored.
  • State v. Davis 457 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Hudnall 444 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    State v. Wrestle, Inc., reversed on other grounds, Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Stucke 419 So. 2d 939 La. 1982
  • State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
  • State v. Walters 408 So. 2d 1337 La. 1982
  • State v. Echols 376 So. 2d 1244 La. 1979
    and State v. Wrestle, Inc., rev'd on other grounds sub nom Burch v. Louisiana, 441 U.S. 130 , 99 S.Ct.
  • State v. Short 368 So. 2d 1078 La. 1979
    These contentions were rejected in, respectively, (No. 62,127), and State v. Wrestle, Inc., (La.