Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hysell, 364 So. 2d 1300.

22 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Colin Gilmartin La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2020
Bailey, 446 So.2d at 355; (La.
State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
in which the search warrant failed to indicate which apartment in a two-apartment building was the object of the search.
State v. Jenkins 764 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
in which the search warrant failed to indicate which apartment at a two-apartment building was the object of the search.
State v. Johnson 558 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
the court upheld a search warrant even though there were two apartments at the address listed because the officers executing the search knew which apartment was to be searched since the informant had pointed it out to them.
State v. Dennis 540 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
State v. Ockman 466 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Helsley 457 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Bailey 446 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
the court alluded to the fact that the officers who executed the search warrant were the same ones who obtained the information and prepared the affidavit.
State v. Majors 430 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Ratcliff 416 So. 2d 528 La. 1982
State v. Herrod 412 So. 2d 564 La. 1982
State v. Brown 412 So. 2d 1064 La. 1982
involved the sufficiency of a description which designated a street address, but did not indicate which of the two apartments at that address was to be searched.
State v. Sugar 408 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
State v. Overstreet 408 So. 2d 1300 La. 1982
State v. Smith 397 So. 2d 1326 La. 1981
this Court reviewed the sufficiency of a description which designated a street address but did not indicate which of two apartments at that address was to be searched.
State v. Beavers 394 So. 2d 1218 La. 1981
State v. Tranum 384 So. 2d 367 La. 1980
State v. Normand 380 So. 2d 1207 La. 1980
In State v. Paciera, supra, this Court also emphasized that “[t]he affidavit submitted to the magistrate may be based entirely upon hearsay, but, if so, it must set forth underlying circumstances and details sufficient to provide a substantial factual basis by which the magistrate might find reliable both the informant and the information given by him.” State v. Boksham, supra
State v. Gordy 380 So. 2d 1347 La. 1980
State v. Rudolph 369 So. 2d 1320 La. 1979
State v. Paciera, supra .
State v. Huckaby 368 So. 2d 1059 La. 1979
State v. Boksham 370 So. 2d 491 La. 1979