DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Collum, 365 So. 2d 1272.

14 citing documents.

  • State in the Interest of K.H. 725 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • State, in Interest of Wells 532 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    where the Supreme Court only regarded Dino as applying to confessions of persons under seventeen.
  • State v. Johnson 479 So. 2d 344 La. 1985
  • State v. Handley 453 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Shea 421 So. 2d 200 La. 1982
  • State v. Kent 391 So. 2d 429 La. 1981
    [3] this court refused to accord retroactive effect to Dino's exclusionary rule and held admissible a confession that police officers had obtained prior to that decision in justifiable reliance on the totality of circumstances rule that had been repeatedly approved by this court.
  • Crook v. White 393 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
  • State v. Harris 383 So. 2d 1 La. 1980
    However, determined that because the rule announced in Dino does not go to the integrity of the fact finding process, the additional safeguards announced in Dino would not apply to cases in which the trial began before the effective date of that decision—June 15, 1978.
  • State, in Interest of Lewis 377 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    the Supreme Court in discussing its holding in Dino made the following statement: By that decision this Court decided that a confession of a person under seventeen years of age is not admissible unless the juvenile actually consulted with an attorney or an adult before waiving his right to silence; that the
  • State v. Kent 371 So. 2d 1319 La. 1979
  • State v. Sheppard 371 So. 2d 1135 La. 1979
  • State v. Volk 369 So. 2d 128 La. 1979
  • State ex rel. Collum 368 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    We granted a rehearing to reconsider our first opinion in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in State of Louisiana v. Collum, La., .
  • State ex rel. Joiner 365 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    However, in light of the very recent Supreme Court pronouncement in State of Louisiana v. Donnie Franklin Collum (La.1978) , we find that the precautionary measures prescribed in Dino for the proper admission of a minor’s inculpatory statement do not apply to the instant case.