DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Smith v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY, 366 So. 2d 1318.

13 citing documents.

  • Anthony Chenevert and Cindy Langwell v. Rodney Lee Johnson, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
  • Allen v. EXHIBITION HALL AUTHORITY 842 So. 2d 373 La. 2003
    See also, Smith v. State, Department of Public Safety, Edwards v. Daigle, 201 La.
  • Touchard v. Williams 617 So. 2d 885 La. 1993
  • Tillman v. CSX TRANSP. CO. 617 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Smith v. State, Through the Department of Public Safety, (La.
  • St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith 609 So. 2d 809 La. 1992
    App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, [20] the Second Circuit held that an act changing the law as construed a year earlier by this court in Smith v. State, Through Dept. of Public Safety, was "a classic example of interpretive legislation which did not create a new rule but simply established the meaning that the interpreted statute, La.
  • Nichols v. Mid-American Van Line 522 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
    Safety, Dore v. Tugwell, 228 La.
  • Sarratt v. Cappaert Enterprises 442 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Barron v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY LICENSE CONTROL 397 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    In Smith v. State, through Department of Public Safety, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that an habitual offender could be granted limited driving privileges in hardship cases during the five year revocation period, construing the and in La.R.S.
  • State, in Interest of Bruno 388 So. 2d 784 La. 1980
  • Hazley v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety 388 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    32:1479, as amended by Acts 220 and 347 of 1979, can plaintiff be granted a restricted license as was formerly possible under Smith v. State, through Department of Public Safety, (1978).
  • Wheeler v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUB. SAFETY, ETC. 377 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    32:1471, et seq., the Motor Vehicle Habitual Offender Law, which was interpreted by the Louisiana Supreme Court in the recent case of Smith v. State, through Department of Public Safety
  • Waggoner v. Kellogg-Moore Oil Co., Inc. 375 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    Safety, and Dore v. Tugwell, 228 La.
  • Smith v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety 372 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    eting financial responsibility requirements, a person so adjudged may petition the court for the restoration of his privilege to operate a motor vehicle, and such restoration may be given, in the court’s discretion, for good cause shown, upon the terms and conditions prescribed by the court.” The Supreme Court granted writs and reversed us. Smith v. State, Through the Department of Public Safety