Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Marse, 365 So. 2d 1319.

132 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kayla Jean Giles Coutee La. 2025
art. 802(1) to charge the jury on all the applicable law, including “every phase of the case supported by the evidence whether or not accepted [] as true.” (1978).
State of Louisiana v. Kerri Seeney Monic La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Master La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
P. art. 921; State v. Perkins, supra; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Ralph Haire La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
P. art. 921; State v. Perkins, supra; (La.
State of Louisiana v. Michael Duck La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
denied, 541 U.S. 905, 124 S. Ct. 1604, 158 L. Ed. 2d 248 (2004); (La.
State Of Louisiana v. David Brown La. 2022
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana v. Brian L. Pope La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Distinguished State Of Louisiana v. David Leger La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
State v. George 204 So. 3d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
As a general matter, a trial judge has the duty to instruct jurors as to “every phase of the case supported by the evidence whether or not accepted by him as true,” and that duty extends to “any theory of defense which a jury could reasonably infer from the evidence.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher J. Wells 209 So. 3d 709 La. 2015
art. 802(1) to charge the jury on the law applicable to the case, including ―every phase of the case supported by the evidence whether or not accepted by [her] as true‖, (1978), provided a lengthy instruction that was likely intended to cover each of these different versions of the incident.
State v. Jones 166 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004)
State v. Musacchia 131 So. 3d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
to support his position that his request for a special jury instruction should have been granted.
State v. Perkins 120 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Jones 119 So. 3d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Ball 131 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Cleveland 115 So. 3d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
art. 921; -24 (La.1978).
State v. Franklin 87 So. 3d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Ruffin 82 So. 3d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
-24 (La.1978); La.C.Cr.P.
State of Louisiana v. Calvin Charles Barfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
14:110.2 and instruct it that if they find that the evidence points to a violation of R.S.
State v. Barfield 81 So. 3d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
14:110.2 and instruct it that if they find that the evidence points to a violation of R.S.
State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Sparks 68 So. 3d 435 La. 2011
See, (man-slaughter verdict returned).
State of Louisiana v. Eric Joseph Smith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Smith 58 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State *977 v. Marse, see also La.Code Crim.
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Edward Boyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
State v. Boyer 56 So. 3d 1119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. Scott 26 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
P. art. 921; State v. Lipscomb, 99-2094, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Hollins 15 So. 3d 69 La. 2009
-24 (La.1978);4 La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Dell 10 So. 3d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Lawson 1 So. 3d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Patterson, 99-994 (La.App.
State v. Joshua 973 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
[2] however, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the trial court is required to charge the jury, when properly requested, "as to the law applicable to any theory of defense which a jury could reasonably infer from the evidence."
State v. Gage 965 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004)
State of Louisiana v. Larry Surratt and Cynthia Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Surratt 932 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
State v. Lane 927 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004)
State v. Valentine 929 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
802; 3 ; State v. Goodley, 01-0077 (La.6/21/02), .
State v. Garner 913 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004)
State v. Collins 910 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
*462 to support his position that the jury may be charged with a non-responsive crime.
State v. Uloho 875 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
1604 , 158 L.Ed.2d 248 (2004)
State v. Tate 851 So. 2d 921 La. 2003
State v. Simpson 829 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
art. 921, State v. Giles, 93-0103 (La.
State v. Lipscomb 823 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
art. 921; State v. Giles, 93-0103 (La.App.
State v. Goodley 820 So. 2d 478 La. 2002
State v. Patorno 822 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Gilkers 820 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Jarvis 811 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Neal, XXXX-XXXX, p. 23 (La.6/29/01), , see also La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Baker 796 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Neal 796 So. 2d 649 La. 2001

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by