Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lee, 364 So. 2d 1024.

75 citing documents.

State v. Johnson 443 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
State v. Broadway 440 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Williams 438 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State v. Brooks 431 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
State v. Seiss 428 So. 2d 444 La. 1983
State v. Champion 412 So. 2d 1048 La. 1982
State v. Arnaud 412 So. 2d 1013 La. 1982
State v. Vaccaro 411 So. 2d 415 La. 1982
State v. Lawson 410 So. 2d 1101 La. 1982
State v. Sugar 408 So. 2d 1329 La. 1982
State v. Messer 408 So. 2d 1354 La. 1982
State v. Donahue 408 So. 2d 1262 La. 1982
State v. Long 408 So. 2d 1221 La. 1982
State v. Ordonez 395 So. 2d 778 La. 1981
State v. Brown 395 So. 2d 1301 La. 1981
State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
State v. Lawson 393 So. 2d 1260 La. 1981
State v. Vosloh 387 So. 2d 1174 La. 1980
State v. Johnson 389 So. 2d 1302 La. 1980
While a defendant's right to the counsel of his choice is firmly established in our law, that right may not be used to obstruct the orderly procedure in our courts nor to interfere with the fair administration of justice, and this Court has long so ruled: State v. St.
State v. Light 392 So. 2d 649 La. 1980
State v. Reed 378 So. 2d 923 La. 1980
State v. Carthan 377 So. 2d 308 La. 1979
State v. Blackwell 377 So. 2d 110 La. 1979
State v. Jones 376 So. 2d 125 La. 1979
However, rehearing denied 1978, this court emphasized the fact that this right cannot be manipulated to obstruct the orderly procedure of the courts, and that it must be exercised at an appropriate time and in a reasonable manner.
State v. English 367 So. 2d 815 La. 1979