Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Valentine, 364 So. 2d 595.
-
State v. Barrett
247 So. 3d 164
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
See , State v. Valentine , (La.
-
State v. Robertson
243 So. 3d 1196
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State v. Valentine , , 596-97 (La.
-
State v. Shaffer
77 So. 3d 939
La. 2011
See, -97 (La.1978); -94 (La.1976).
-
State v. Dyer
77 So. 3d 928
La. 2011
See, -97 (La.1978); -94 (La.1976).
-
State v. Leason
77 So. 3d 933
La. 2011
See, -97 (La.1978); -94 (La.1976).
-
State v. Jackson
714 So. 2d 87
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Stokes, 26,003 (La.App.
-
State v. Prince
688 So. 2d 643
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Beason, 26725 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/7/95), , writ denied, 95-1388 (La.10/27/95), .
- State v. Beason 653 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- State v. Harvin 437 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- State v. Boyer 406 So. 2d 143 La. 1981
- State v. Lindsey 404 So. 2d 466 La. 1981
- State v. Motton 395 So. 2d 1337 La. 1981
- State v. Bodley 394 So. 2d 584 La. 1981
- State v. Coleman 390 So. 2d 865 La. 1980
- State v. Hartman 388 So. 2d 688 La. 1980
- State v. Landry 388 So. 2d 699 La. 1980
-
State v. Jones
386 So. 2d 85
La. 1980
art. 841, this Court has not taken the same attitude where the defendant complains of an excessive sentence *87 and where the trial judge imposes a sentence with inadequate compliance with the mandatory requirement of La.C.Cr.P.
-
State v. Skipper
387 So. 2d 592
La. 1980
art. 841; for the reason that any such objection should first be made in the trial court in order that the trial judge be presented with the opportunity to correct any such error.
- State v. Vernon 385 So. 2d 200 La. 1980
-
State v. Williams
383 So. 2d 369
La. 1980
State v. Main Motors, Inc.
- State v. Benitez 381 So. 2d 815 La. 1980
- State v. Hollins 375 So. 2d 922 La. 1979