Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Weinberg, 364 So. 2d 964.
- State of Louisiana v. William G Perkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
-
State of Louisiana v. Roosevelt Randolph
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
An application for a search warrant “must [also] establish a probable continuing nexus between the place sought to be searched and the property sought to be seized.” Casey, 1999-0023, p. 4, 775 So.2d at 1028 (citing State v. Weinberg, 13 (La.
-
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr.
263 So. 3d 337
La. 2018
1980); )); cf. Wilms, 449 So.
- State of Louisiana v. Lamondre Tucker 181 So. 3d 590 La. 2015
- State v. Young 140 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
-
State v. Cunningham
88 So. 3d 1196
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“Additionally, a search warrant must establish a probable continuing nexus between the place sought to be searched and the property sought to be seized.” State v. Casey, 99-0023, p. 4 (La.1/26/00), ().
- State v. Jackson 11 So. 3d 524 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
- State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
- State v. Williams 859 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- State v. Robertson 840 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- State v. Pham 839 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- State v. Sylvester 834 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Hickerson 838 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Kirk 833 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
- State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
- State v. Young 820 So. 2d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Lawrence 817 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
- State v. Lewis 782 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Hodge 781 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
- State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
-
State v. Pennison
763 So. 2d 671
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Fisher , 97-1133, at p. 5 n. 4; 720 So.2d at 1183, n. 4
- Melder v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 731 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
- Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
- State v. Fisher 720 So. 2d 1179 La. 1998
- State v. Jones 720 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
- State v. Toney 687 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
-
State v. Varnado
675 So. 2d 268
La. 1996
1980) (a search warrant must establish a "probable continuing nexus between the place sought to be searched and the property sought to be seized.") ().
-
State v. Powell
598 So. 2d 454
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct.
- State v. Lee 577 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Williams 567 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- State v. Calhoun 554 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
-
State v. Jackson
545 So. 2d 1228
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Tilley, supra .
- Harrison v. Phillips 539 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
- State v. Massey 535 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
- State v. Taylor 531 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
- State v. Carr 530 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Tilley 525 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- State v. Meyers 520 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
State v. DiMaggio
461 So. 2d 439
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
The State argues that to determine probable cause for a search warrant the evidence must be viewed from a common sense and realistic approach [ ] and that the standard for probable cause for a warrant is much less than for proof beyond a reasonable doubt [ ].
- State v. Montgomery 432 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- State v. Thibodeaux 414 So. 2d 366 La. 1982
- State v. Johnson 408 So. 2d 1280 La. 1982
- State v. Stephenson 387 So. 2d 1111 La. 1980
- State v. Baylis 388 So. 2d 713 La. 1980
- State v. Morvant 384 So. 2d 765 La. 1980
- State v. Jackson 381 So. 2d 485 La. 1980
- State v. Normand 380 So. 2d 1207 La. 1980
-
State v. Welsh
371 So. 2d 1314
La. 1979
No. 62,434; (50-day lapse upheld); (83-day lapse upheld).
- State v. Johnson 371 So. 2d 1155 La. 1979
- State v. Coleman 369 So. 2d 1286 La. 1979