Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Hammer v. Combre 503 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Further, the Supreme Court amplified and further delineated the standard thusly: "Manifestly erroneous in its simplest terms, means `clearly wrong'.
Bergeron v. Service Industries, Inc. 503 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Duckworth, supra and Guillory, supra.
Clement v. Torres 503 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
“It is well established that factual findings of a jury, particularly those based on evaluations of credibility, should not be reversed on appeal unless clearly wrong.” (La.
Schexnayder v. Schexnayder 503 So. 2d 104 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Levine v. Brailey 502 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Jefferson v. Antee 502 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Blair v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 502 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
3rd Cir.1985); ) and/or the court abused its much discretion in making its damage awards ( (La.App.
Vanderwater v. Washington 502 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Funderburk v. Chevalier 502 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Simmons v. La. Health and Human Resources 502 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
We first note that in reviewing factual findings based on testimony adduced in open court we must follow the clearly wrong, or manifest error, (La.
Heard v. Bonnie and Clyde's of Hattiesburg, Inc. 501 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Boswell v. Boswell 501 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Fuller v. Franks Petroleum, Inc. 501 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Belk v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc. 501 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Doss v. Hartford Fire Ins.
Stone v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 501 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
[Citations *856 omitted]
Lyman v. Town of Sunset 500 So. 2d 390 La. 1987
Sparacello v. Andrews 501 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Harvell v. Michelli 500 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Snyder v. Bergeron 501 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Breaux v. Exxon Corp. 511 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Cormier v. Lone Star Life Insurance Co. 500 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
and numerous subsequent cases with similar holdings.
Devillier v. McCarty 500 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Smith v. Lewis 499 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
to affirm these district court findings unless they are clearly wrong, and we cannot say that they are manifestly erroneous.
Sanders v. Old Quarter Tours, Inc. 499 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Slay v. Old Southern Life Insurance Co. 498 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Ward v. Sylvester 498 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Smith v. West 498 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Chaisson v. Daigle 499 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Deville v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 498 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Torres v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co. 499 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Oubre v. Bank of St. Charles and Trust Co. 499 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
[Citations omitted] (La.
Butler v. Crescent Land & Development Co. 499 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Gallagher v. Favrot 499 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Wegman v. Central Transmission, Inc. 499 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Arceneaux, v. Domingue, (La.
Harris v. Pineset 499 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
McCoin v. McGehee 498 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
STANDARD OF APPELLATE REVIEW Ordinarily, trial court findings of fact by judge or jury are reviewed on appeal under the manifest error (clearly wrong)
Landry v. Fickling 498 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Louque v. Smith 499 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
St. Amant v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 499 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
LeBlanc v. Andrew 497 So. 2d 1056 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Barnett v. Lee 497 So. 2d 1072 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Bourgeois v. Lake Development Corp. 498 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Gravois v. Succession of Trauth 498 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
Jeansonne v. Corbett 496 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Sutton's Steel & Supply, Inc. v. Van Stavern 496 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Lonthier v. Northwest Ins. Co. 497 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Fogal v. Boudreaux 497 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Rourks v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 497 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Waterbury v. Waterbury 496 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Since their testimony together with the other evidence in the record furnishes a reasonable factual basis for the trial judge's finding that the transactions were real and not simulations, (La.
Derouen v. Derouen 496 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986