Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Lachney v. Sentry Insurance Co. 471 So. 2d 1058 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Freeman v. Thomas 472 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 472 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Carroll v. Holton 472 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Tucker v. Associated Grocers, Inc. 473 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Sanchez v. Viccinelli Sheet Metal & Roofing Co. 473 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
states that "the appellate court should not disturb [the trial judge's or jury's] finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong."
Daigle v. Joffrion 472 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Louisiana Troopers Ass'n v. City of Baton Rouge 475 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Foy v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 475 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Burbank v. LeBeouf 471 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Gilder v. Branton 471 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
State v. Beauchamp 473 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
mandates that the findings of the trial court will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous.
Elzy v. ABC Ins. Co. 472 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
We reject that factual contention because the trial judge's contrary conclusion is supported by this record, and is not clearly wrong
STATE, THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Townsend 473 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development v. Townsend 473 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Joseph v. Bohn Ford, Inc. 472 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
McCurry v. City of New Orleans 475 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Hailey v. Panno 472 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Sims 472 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Wear v. Ernest 472 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Since the issue in this case concerns a factual determination made by the trier *146 of fact, i.e., that the plaintiff was contribu-torily negligent in causing the accident, we must review the record using the “manifest error” standard of review, and their progeny.
Strahan v. Boudreaux 472 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Brown & Root, Inc. v. Southeast Equipment Co. 470 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Moore v. McDermott, Inc. 469 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Burge v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Health & Human Resources 469 So. 2d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Without a clear articulation of manifest error, we must not disturb the trial court’s findings or damage awards.
Rawls v. Morris 470 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Boozer v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 470 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Rodney v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 470 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Atkins v. Frazell 470 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
and cases cited therein; (La.App.
Soverign Ins. Co. v. Texas Pipeline Co. 470 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Dumond v. Houma Toyota, Inc.-AMC Jeep, Inc. 470 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 967 La. 1985
The Court of Appeal found that the jury's verdict was "based upon a reasonable evaluation of credibility," an applied review standard which seemed quite similar to the "reasonable basis for [a trial court's] finding"
RAYNE STATE BANK & TR. CO. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
In Re Adoption of Broussard 469 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Randall v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 470 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Land and Marine Services, Inc. v. Diablo Data Systems, Inc. of Louisiana 471 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Joint Comm'n on Accreditation of Hosps., Inc. 470 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Golden v. Madden Contracting Co., Inc. 469 So. 2d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Nelson v. Evans 470 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Estate of Lohan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. 469 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Johnson v. State, Department of Health & Human Resources 470 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
We cannot say that the trial judge was “clearly wrong,” in concluding that the fractures occurred while the infant was a patient in defendant’s hospital.
Blakeman v. Saenger Art Center, Inc. 469 So. 2d 1124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Walters v. Jacob 470 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Followed Daniels v. Allstate Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Perkins v. Certa 469 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Clarke v. Progressive American Ins. Co. 469 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Hughes v. General Motors Guide Lamp Div. 469 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Fusilier v. Northbrook Excess & Surplus Ins. Co. 471 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Howell v. State, Department of Transportation 467 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Arcemont v. Voisin 468 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Dow Chemical Co. v. Pitre 468 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985