Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Jean v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 460 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Minor v. Robertson 461 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(rehearing denied 1979).
Landaiche v. Lou-Con 461 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Rico v. Vangundy 461 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
and considering the legal duty set forth in Soprano , we are of the opinion that the trial court was not manifestly erroneous in finding appellant solely liable.
Melbourne Bros. Construction Co. v. Gnots-Reserve, Inc. 461 So. 2d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Rule 52(a) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.; George W. Bennett Bryson & Company, Ltd. v. Norton Lilly & Company, Inc., 502 F.2d 1045 , 1975 AMC 1732 (5th Cir.1974).
James v. Celotex Corp. 461 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Arceneaux v. Do *452 mingue
Horton v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 461 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Hughes v. Querbes & Nelson, Inc. 460 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Varnado v. Continental Ins.
Frost v. Albright 460 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Cutchall v. Great American Pump Co. 460 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 458 So. 2d 1260 La. 1984
Berthelot v. Imes 459 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
It is well settled in Louisiana that the trial court's findings of fact are entitled to great weight, and we may not substitute our own evaluations and inferences for the reasonable evaluations and inferences of the trial court unless those conclusions are clearly erroneous.
Bickham v. Goings 460 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
we are bound to accept those findings unless the record establishes that they are clearly wrong.
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 459 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
obliges us to accept the findings *1238 of the jury, just as we would the findings of a trial judge, when they are based upon a reasonable evaluation of credibility, and prohibits us from reversing those findings, even though we may have made different findings had we tried the case, unless the record as a w
Aymami v. Boudousouie 460 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Rutland v. Rutland 460 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Poynot v. Pfister 461 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
The entire record considered, we cannot conclude that the trial court was clearly wrong, in its conclusion that, in effect, opponents overcame the presumption of capacity by “clear and convincing evidence,” and proved that decedent lacked testamentary capacity on August 12 and 28, 1977 and April 18, 1978.
Sutherland v. Board of Com'rs 459 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Carter v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana St. Univ. 459 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Jacobs v. Grayson, *1267 (La.App.
Hayes v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 459 So. 2d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Neldare v. Board of Sup'rs of Southern University 460 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Williams v. Cortney Co. 459 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Veal v. Church's Chicken of New Orleans 459 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Gallardo v. New Orleans Steamboat Co. 459 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Bosarge v. New Orleans Street Dept. 459 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Miller v. E.M. Babst Co. 459 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
DiMattia v. Gulf South Beverage, Inc. 459 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Accordingly, we decline to disturb these factual findings.
Clark v. Park 'N Fly of Louisiana 459 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Carmadelle v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 459 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Protti v. Tolmas 459 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Wm. B. Coleman Co., Inc. v. Ackel 459 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Evans v. Newton 459 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Savoie v. Judice 458 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
LSA Const. Art. 5, Section 10(B)
Johnston v. Spears 459 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Clark v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 458 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Hopson v. Garner Bros. Masonry Contractors, Inc. 459 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Mallet v. La. Nursing Homes, Inc. 459 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Ragusa v. Burns 462 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES v. Smith 459 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Wiger v. Meyer 459 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Harrington v. Oliver 459 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Sepulvado v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, Inc. 459 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State in Interest of PS 459 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Accordingly, the appellate court must determine, after a review of the entire record, whether the findings of the trial court are clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.
Towns v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. 459 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Johnson 458 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Burrell v. Schlesinger 459 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Jaeckle v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 457 So. 2d 646 La. 1984
Bourgeois v. Bill Watson's Investments, Inc. 458 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Fox v. Don Siebarth Pontiac, Inc. 458 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Taunton v. Cane Air, Inc., supra.
Adams v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. 457 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984