Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.
- Wilson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 446 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Herquet v. Ford 446 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
Fontenot v. Memphis Farms, Inc.
445 So. 2d 197
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
An “appellate court should not disturb such a finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong.”
- Bushnell v. Artis 445 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- Karam v. Ashworth 445 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
Schepp v. Olin Corp.
445 So. 2d 1280
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
the Court explained its previous language and elaborated on the standard to be followed by intermediate appellate courts.
- Hebert v. Neyrey 445 So. 2d 1165 La. 1984
- Heyl v. Heyl 445 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- State, in Interest of Quilter 445 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- Wise v. Key 445 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
- Jones v. Thibodeaux 445 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Smith v. Giarrusso 446 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
- Cosse v. Bruley 445 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
- Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 444 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
Ottermann v. Ganus
444 So. 2d 726
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
“ ‘Manifestly erroneous,’ in its simplest terms means ‘clearly wrong.’ ” After reviewing the evidence, the trial judge determined that appellee did not receive the notice of intent to renew the option.
- G/O ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Mid Louisiana Gas Co. 444 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-
Carbonell v. Department of Health & Human Resources
444 So. 2d 151
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Where the evidence in a disciplinary action is received by a referee and the Commission does not see or hear the witnesses
- Carter v. Financial Advisor & Consultant 444 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Matherne v. Hartford Insurance Co.
444 So. 2d 146
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Fortenberry v. Dixie Brewing Company, Inc., (La.App.
- Adcomm of Louisiana, Inc. v. Coastal Restaurant Enterprises, Inc. 444 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Bowers Electronic Enterprises v. Tiffin Inn Pancake House of Baton Rouge, Inc. 444 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Billiot Brothers, Inc. v. Bercier 447 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Woodard v. Gregory and Cook, Inc. 442 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Henry v. Pitre Ford Co. 442 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Caubarreaux v. Hines 442 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Farnsworth v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. 442 So. 2d 1340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Charles v. Durand 442 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Savoie v. Estate of Rogers 442 So. 2d 1323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Hardee v. Tate & Sons, Inc.
442 So. 2d 1390
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted on remand, (La.App.
- Flamm v. Flamm 442 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- Landry v. Bill Garrett Chevrolet, Inc. 443 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- Ageous v. Allstate Insurance Co. 442 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Nodier 442 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Tubular Threading, Inc. v. Scandaliato 443 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
-
State, Through Dept. of Highways v. Luling Indus.
443 So. 2d 672
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
and Arceneaux v. Domingue, et al.
- Caldwell v. Texas Industries, Inc. 441 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
-
Shepard v. Calloway
441 So. 2d 488
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Even should we agree, that the trial court was not clearly wrong in these factual conclusions, the record is abundantly and overwhelmingly clear that the legal effect of the circumstances found by the trial court establishes only a conditional obligation.
- Dupree v. Louisiana Transit Management, Inc. 441 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
- Thornell v. Payne & Keller, Inc. 442 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Red Arrow Sales, Inc. v. Dixie Motors, Inc. 442 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- GENERAL AM. OIL CO. OF TEXAS v. Williams, Inc. 441 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Ross v. Noble 442 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Vernon v. Aetna Life and Cas. Ins. Co. 442 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Durbin v. Cockerham
442 So. 2d 634
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Thus, when reviewing the evidence.
- Eschete v. Gulf South Beverages 442 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Sibley v. Insured Lloyds 442 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Jackson v. Brumfield
442 So. 2d 518
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
and we may not substitute our own evaluations and inferences for the reasonable evaluations and inferences of the trier of fact unless those conclusions are clearly erroneous.
- Riley v. Pennix 442 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Stanley v. Guy 442 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Grice v. Albert 442 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983