Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Barnes v. Wilhite 434 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Starks v. Kelly 435 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Wilson v. Pou 436 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Daspit v. Swann 436 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Hampton v. Rubicon Chemicals, Inc. 436 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Landry v. Baton Rouge Lumber Co. 434 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Gould v. State Through La. Dept. of Correct. 435 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
As to facts, delineates our review of facts as first an ascertainment that there is in the record "a reasonable factual basis" for the trial court's factual findings and second a determination from the record that the trial court's factual findings are not "clearly wrong."
Carter v. Safeco Ins. Co. 435 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Wollerson v. Department of Agriculture 436 So. 2d 1241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Williams v. City of New Orleans 433 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Harrelson v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. 434 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Peyton v. Bogan 434 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
In light of their strong evidentiary support the trial judge’s
Delhommer v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 435 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
We first note that a reviewing court is empowered to overturn factual findings only where such findings are manifestly erroneous
Perry v. Hotard's Plumbing 436 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Adcock v. Marshall Exploration, Inc. 434 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Kehel v. Yahfoufi 433 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 433 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Minkos v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 436 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS v. DERBES 436 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Derbes 436 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Fox v. LOUISIANA STATE RACING COM'N 433 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Pennington v. Reading & Bates Construction Co. 432 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Fusilier v. Shurtleff & Andrews, Inc. 432 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Rivet v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. 434 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
2nd Cir. 1982) writ denied
Pitre v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co. 434 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Harbor Inn, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corp. 432 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Morgan 432 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
White v. Picou's Builders Supply Co. 432 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Canter v. Koehring Company, supra.
LaFauci v. Martin 433 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State D. of Trans. & Dev. v. Estate of Clark 432 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1981), writ denied
Hebert v. Neyrey 432 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Sciortino v. Alfano 435 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
also, in which the court, clarifying Canter , stated: "...
Bowman v. Coursey 433 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Carollo v. Shoney's Big Boy Enterprises 433 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
State, in Interest of Racine 433 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT v. Tynes 433 So. 2d 809 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Dardis v. Madere 433 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Jacobs v. Grayson 432 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Oshinski v. Central Nat. Ins. Co. of Omaha 432 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
we have carefully reviewed the record and concluded that the trial court's findings are not clearly wrong.
Brock v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 433 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Rosenblath v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. 432 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Smith v. Reliance Ins. Co. 431 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Copple v. Gonyea 431 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Taylor v. State 431 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1979) (negligence is a question of fact); (trier of fact's factual conclusions cannot be disturbed absent manifest error).
Dussouy v. Gulf Coast Investment Corp. 433 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Miller v. Broussard 430 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.
Bruins v. United States Fleet Leasing, Inc. 430 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
and conclude that the trial judge's finding that "Mr. Gibson had crossed over into the Bruins' lane of traffic and collided with the Bruins' vehicle" is fully supported by the record.
Manuel Truck & Equip. Co. v. BG Hooker Pet. 430 So. 2d 1367 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Preen v. LeRuth 430 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Bender v. General Electric Credit Corp. 430 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
It is well established that where the trier of fact makes a finding which is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous), an appellate court is empowered to correct that error