Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Lindstrom v. Arnold 421 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Succession of Kilpatrick 422 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Henson v. Handee Corp. 421 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Burnell v. Sportran Transit System Co. 421 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Hicks v. Stone 425 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Latiolais v. Ashy Enterprises, Inc. 420 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Reliable Rubber & Plastic Machinery Co. v. Wirt Manufacturing Inc. 420 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hoyt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 420 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Bankers & Shippers Insurance Co. of New York v. Holiday Rambler Corp. 420 So. 2d 1350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Thornton v. Pedersen 421 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Arceneaux v. Domingue, writ granted, on remand, (La.App.
Coiled Tubing, Inc. v. Morris 420 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
App. 3rd Cir.1980), this Court reiterated the law concerning appellate review of factual issues: "
Harris v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 420 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Meche v. Graham 421 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Wallace v. Wallace 420 So. 2d 1326 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Gisclair v. Cajun Trucking, Inc. 421 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Howard v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 420 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Naylor v. La. Dept. of Public Highways 423 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
an appellate court should not disturb a finding of fact unless it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong.
Daney v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 421 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Cooper v. Heirs of Cooper 421 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Prentice Oil and Gas Co. v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEVELOPMENT 421 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Brewer v. Davis 421 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Mason v. Maestri 421 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Canter v. Koehring Company, 283 So .2d 716 (La.1973).
McMullan v. Tolbert 421 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Seal v. Seal 421 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 421 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Faust v. Faust 421 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
This test is substantially similar to the rule applied by the appellate court, which prevents the upsetting of a trial court determination of fact unless it is ‘clearly wrong.’
Bridgewater v. State ex rel. Department of Corrections 422 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Benton v. Dolese Concrete Co. 423 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
we find the jury’s conclusion that the Dolese truck driver was not negligent is clearly wrong.
Mollere v. Aguilar 422 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
The reason for this well-settled principle of review is based not only upon the trial court’s better capacity to evaluate live witnesses (as compared with the appellate court’s access only to a cold record), but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.” wherein they explained the manifest error rule as follows: “ * * * ‘Manifestly- erroneous,’ in its simplest terms, means ‘clearly wrong.’ We said, then, that the appellate court should not di
Sellers v. Breaux 422 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Josephs v. Austin 420 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Wiley v. Karam 421 So. 2d 294 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Fusilier v. City of Houma 421 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Tate v. Jacobs Engineering Co. 421 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Achord v. HE Weise Const. Co. 422 So. 2d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Holmes v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Co. 422 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
State, Department of Transportation & (La.App.
Progressive Bank & Trust Co. v. Dieco Specialty Co., Inc. 421 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Distinguished Cazes v. Robertson 421 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Kel-Kan Inv. Corp. v. Village of Greenwood 418 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Williams v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 420 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Robinson v. FW Woolworth Co. 420 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Jackson v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc. 424 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Creole Sales, Inc. v. H & H Utilities Service Co. 420 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Cardoza v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 420 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Rapp v. Rapp 420 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
McDermott v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 420 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Phillips v. Skate Country East 420 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Mascaro v. Davis 420 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. Atkison 420 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
McElroy v. Allstate Ins. Co. 420 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
As an alternative specification of error, the appellants urge that the jury conclusion in this case, that there was no defect in the design of the Ford automobile, (La.