Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So. 2d 1330.

3491 citing documents.

Sikes v. McLean Trucking Co. 383 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Hongo is clearly liable regardless of whether he knew of the defective brakes.
Franks v. Louisiana Health Serv. & Indem. Co. 382 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Smith v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 385 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
However, ([La.]1978) ([La.]1975).
Bamber Contractors, Inc. v. Morrison Engineering & Contracting Co. 385 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Mayes v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 379 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Conlay v. Houston General Insurance Co., supra.
Ainsworth v. Bituminous Cas. Corp. 379 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
John Deere Indus. Equip. Co. v. Willett Timber Co. 380 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Gaudet v. North River Insurance Co. 381 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Goodwin v. Stathes 381 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
That term is said to mean “clearly wrong.” and Canter v. Koehring Company, supra.
Touchette v. Braud 382 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Defendants properly observe, and we recognize, that on appeal “the appellate review of facts [in civil cases] is not completed by reading so much of the record as will reveal a reasonable factual basis for the finding in the trial court; there must be a further determination that the record establishes that the finding is not clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous).”
Guidry v. Davis 382 So. 2d 250 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Regions v. Regions 381 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Comeaux v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 381 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In view of the trial court’s finding of the proximity between the bus and the automobile when it first came into the bus driver’s view, which finding we are not at liberty to disturb, we agree with the trial court that the precautions taken by the bus driver, when confronted with Morris’ negligent driving, were commensurate with the duty owed to plaintiff.
LeBlanc v. Tyler 381 So. 2d 908 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
our supreme court reviewed the standard of appellate review of facts.
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Diffey 378 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Augustine v. Washington Parish Police Jury 383 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Young v. Wayde 383 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Franklin v. Haughton Timber Co. 377 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Lemoine v. Employers Cas. Co. 378 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Bordelon v. Bordelon 381 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
James v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 388 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Hand v. Reeves 378 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Bordelon v. Safeway Ins. Co. 380 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
General Refrigeration, Etc. v. Style Home Bldrs., Inc. 379 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Cline v. Kroger Co. 379 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Jolivette v. Safeco Ins. Co. 379 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Juneau v. Bordelon 380 So. 2d 208 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Doucet v. Plantation Manor, Inc. 382 So. 2d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Bowman 383 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Coleman v. Egle 376 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Authement's Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. Reisfeld 376 So. 2d 1061 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Arceneaux v. *1066 Domingue
Adoption of Latiolais 376 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Ernst v. HH Burstein Enterprises, Inc. 379 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Arceneaux v. Domingue, La., (1978); and Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973).
Walker v. Gauthier 379 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
we are mandated not to disturb factual findings of the trial court in the absence of manifest error provided the record as a whole establishes such findings are not clearly wrong.
Hanagriff's MacH. Shop, Inc. v. SLAW CONST. CO. 380 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Captain Kevin Corp. v. Bay Drilling Corp. 380 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Pradia v. St. Patrick Hospital of Lake Charles 378 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Powell v. Heck 378 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Governale v. Travelers Insurance Co. 378 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
In order for plaintiff to be entitled to any item of damage, the preponderance of evidence must be that it is reasonably certain that plaintiff has sustained the time [sic] of damage claimed and that the time [sic] of damages was caused by the *617 accident in question.” (Emphasis supplied) our Supreme Court had occasion to examine a trial judge’s use of almost identical language.
Hesse v. Busby 379 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Peloquin v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 378 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Richard v. Standard Fittings 379 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Cordova v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 378 So. 2d 1088 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Nevertheless, the Supreme Court, found the trial judge was "clearly wrong" in sustaining the exception of prescription.
DeRosier v. Dean 378 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Harris v. State Through Huey P. Long Mem. Hosp. 378 So. 2d 383 La. 1979
Lucien v. Lucien 378 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
McCullough v. Delight Distributing & Sales, Inc. 378 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Mullen v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Market, Inc. 378 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Kelley v. Adam 378 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Constitution of 1974, Art. 5, § 10(B), at 1333.
Brunet v. Evangeline Parish Board of Supervisors of Elections 379 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979