Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Monroe, 366 So. 2d 1345.

78 citing documents.

State Of Louisiana v. Oderra Benitez Holmes La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
State of Louisiana v. Mark Anthony Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Broussard 224 So. 3d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Haley 222 So. 3d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Earnest G. Hamilton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Hamilton 216 So. 3d 367 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
|fi1347 (La.1978), In such instances, prejudice is presumed.
State v. Hampton 195 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson La. 2014
State v. Lewis 112 So. 3d 796 La. 2013
State of Louisiana v. Brady J. Harrington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
appeal after remand, cert.
State v. Harrington 129 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
appeal after remand, cert.
State v. Magee 103 So. 3d 285 La. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Rodney Ian Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
appeal after remand, cert.
State v. Barnes 93 So. 3d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
appeal after remand, cert.
State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Freeze, swpra; Lewis, supra; cert denied, 463 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph T. Plauche La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
In support of his argument, wherein the court stated, Where an accused has exhausted all of his peremptory challenges before completion of the panel, he is entitled to complain on appeal of a ruling refusing to maintain a challenge for cause made by him.
State v. Plauche 32 So. 3d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
In support of his argument, wherein the court stated, Where an accused has exhausted all of his peremptory challenges before completion of the panel, he is entitled to complain on appeal of a ruling refusing to maintain a challenge for cause made by him.
State v. Frank 957 So. 2d 724 La. 2007
The following cases involved a killing during the course of an armed robbery: (La.
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
By way of contrast, this court reversed a conviction and remanded after finding that a challenge for cause should have been sustained against a prospective juror who, at the time of trial, was employed *308 as an assistant district attorney assigned to the Career Criminal Bureau, in the same office as the assistant distr
State of Louisiana v. Darwin Gauthier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Gauthier 916 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
State v. Taylor 781 So. 2d 1205 La. 2001
State v. Robertson, 92-2660, p. 2 (La.1/14/94)
State v. Anthony 776 So. 2d 376 La. 2000
State v. Coleman 756 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
In support of the objection
State v. Rhodes 722 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
2nd Cir.1985) (reserve police officer working with Monroe City Police Department at time of defendant's investigation by same department); (actively employed criminal deputy investigator); (La.
State v. Maxie 653 So. 2d 526 La. 1995
State v. Lutcher 652 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Breedlove, 199 La.
State v. Fairley 645 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
There, the court, noted that "a prospective juror's statement that he will be fair and impartial is not binding on the trial court.
Explained State v. Robertson 630 So. 2d 1278 La. 1994
State v. Davis 626 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Lee 625 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Freeze, supra ; State v. Lewis, supra
State v. Jones 623 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Ross 623 So. 2d 643 La. 1993
1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991)
State v. Alexander 620 So. 2d 1166 La. 1993
State v. Holmes 619 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Sylvester, supra
State v. Alexander 612 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
In support of his argument, appeal after remand, , cert.
State v. Scriber 605 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Hill 601 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Otis 586 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
appeal after remand, cert.
State v. Kennedy 584 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Walker 577 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
appeal after remand, cert.
State v. Hallal 557 So. 2d 1388 La. 1990
State v. White 544 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Neil 540 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
State v. Rexrode 536 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. McIntyre, supra."
State v. Haynes 514 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Comeaux 514 So. 2d 84 La. 1987
State v. Brown 496 So. 2d 261 La. 1986
[1] "an erroneous ruling of a trial judge which deprives a defendant of one of his peremptory challenges constitutes a substantial violation of a constitutional right requiring reversal of his conviction and sentence."
State v. Hamilton 481 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by