Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hurks v. Bossier, 367 So. 2d 309.

14 citing documents.

Russell v. House of Raeford Farms 968 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Hunt Plywood, Inc. v. Estate of Davis, 26,161 (La.
Heyse v. Ernest Baxley Logging, Inc. 712 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Bossier, Hunt Plywood, Inc. v. Estate of Davis, 26,-161 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/26/94), , writs denied 94-2871, 94-2877 (La.1/27/95), .
Silk v. Silk 691 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Hunt Plywood, Inc. v. Estate of Davis 645 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hunt Plywood, Inc. v. Estate of Davis 645 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. Teague 521 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Winn v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical Co. 522 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Champagne v. Waguespack 461 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Ford v. Plain Dealing Charcoal Co. 457 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
In considering the effects of this statute, stated: Dependency is discussed in The Law of Workmen’s Compensation by Arthur Larson, Matthew Bender, Volume 2, 1976, § 63.11: The general test of dependency may be stated as follows: A showing of actual dependency does not require proof that, without decedent’s contributions, claimant would have lack
Bellamy v. Mr. Pride Car Wash 436 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
CNA Insurance v. Fincher 428 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Castle v. Prudhomme Tank Truck Line, Inc. 417 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
App. 3rd Cir. 1978), reversed on other grounds, .
Moore v. Millers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. of Texas 406 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
proof of actual dependency does not require a showing that the claimant would have lacked the necessities of life without decedent's contributions.
Durbin v. Argonaut Ins. Co. 393 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
In its latest discussion of the dependency issue, cited with approval Larson's definition of dependency.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by