Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Turner, 365 So. 2d 1352.

36 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Dillion La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana Versus Daveon Gilmore La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2025
State v. Spruell 268 So. 3d 397 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Lynn 251 So. 3d 1262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Kisack 190 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
■ the Louisiana Supreme Court addressed a defendant’s claim that the evidence presented at his multiple offender hearing failed to establish the date of discharge from his prior conviction and thus was insufficient.
State v. Duckett 119 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, in pertinent part, the following: 11sWhere it is clear from the record that a co-defendant would give exculpatory testimony if a severance were granted, the denial of a severance is an abuse of discretion.
State v. Holmes 119 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated, in pertinent part, the following: Where it is clear from the record that a co-defendant would give exculpatory testimony if a severance were granted, the denial of a severance is an abuse of discretion.
State v. Tatten 116 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Brown 56 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
This court stated in Martello that while it was possible, though highly improbable, that the defendant received a pardon or commutation of either of his two prior predicate felony convictions, the record reflected that “more probably than not,” the ten-year cleansing period had not expired, for the proposition that this level of proof as to the cleansing period was sufficient to support a habitual offender adjudication.
State v. Lawrence 47 So. 3d 1003 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
("This Court’s review of a trial court’s denial of a new trial motion based on [the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence under La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Condley 904 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
cited by defendant in his brief, the supreme court stated in pertinent part: Where it is clear from the record that a co-defendant would give exculpatory testimony if a severance were granted, the denial of a severance is an abuse of discretion.
State v. Young 863 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Furgerson 781 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Campbell 778 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Martello, supra
State v. Martello 748 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Lorio 662 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
State v. Dukes 609 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Falgout 575 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
State v. Sneed 571 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Johnson 552 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
the Louisiana Supreme Court noted, in response to the defendant's complaint that the date of discharge had not been proven, that the record indicated that more probably than not the five-year cleansing period had not elapsed between the crimes; however, if the defendant was able to show that the five y
State v. Freeman 544 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
State v. Briggs 526 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Brown 527 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
State v. Johnson 514 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
State v. Broadnax 503 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Deboue 496 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Green 469 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
State v. Smith 470 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Mere assertion that defenses will be antagonistic, however, does not require severance, the mover must demonstrate that defenses to be presented will be antagonistic
State v. Hodge 457 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
State v. Humphrey 445 So. 2d 1155 La. 1984
State v. Prudholm 446 So. 2d 729 La. 1984
State v. Powell 438 So. 2d 1306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
314 , 74 L.Ed.2d 291 (1982)
State v. Barkley 412 So. 2d 1380 La. 1982
State v. Caminita 411 So. 2d 13 La. 1982
State v. Manuel 408 So. 2d 1235 La. 1982