Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. Owen, 368 So. 2d 1052.

68 citing documents.

  • Giroir v. South Louisiana Medical Center 453 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • Baach v. Clark 442 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
    As an aid to exercise of the appellate function of a review of facts, at 1056 (La.1979) reiterated the following: "In reviewing the questions of fact and conclusions of fact involved in this suit for damages, the Court of Appeal is mandated to leave undisturbed factual findings of the trial court based upon evidence which furnishes a reasonable factual basis for those findings, unless i
  • Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 433 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    (emphasis added) is factually similar to the instant case.
  • Raymond Through Raymond v. Deaton 423 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hoerner 426 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    As an aid to the exercise of the appellate function of a review of the facts, reiterated the following: "In reviewing the questions of fact and conclusions of fact involved in this suit for damages, the Court of Appeal is mandated to leave undisturbed factual findings of the trial court based upon evidence which furnishes a reasonable factual basis for those findings, unless it finds
  • Williams v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 420 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Cardoza v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 420 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    NOPSI, as a common carrier operating a public conveyance, is charged with the “highest degree of vigilance, care and precaution for the safety of those it undertakes to transport and is liable for the slightest negligence.” Wise v. Prescott, 244 La.
  • McDermott v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 420 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    : Because plaintiffs were fare-paying passengers on a public conveyance and were injured, defendant NOPSI had the burden of proving that it was without the slightest degree of negligence.
  • Hill v. Hamilton 417 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    and the cases cited therein.
  • Alexander v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 411 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    .” From that judgment, which we affirm, defendant appeals.
  • UNITED STATES, ETC. v. Victory Land Co. 410 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • Gilliam v. Hayes 404 So. 2d 1302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Burley v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Davis, et al. v. Owen, et al.
  • Roussel v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 385 So. 2d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    In holding defendant liable, the trial judge in his written reasons for judgment, (1979) and Wise v. Prescott, as cited therein: “Because plaintiffs were fare-paying passengers on a public conveyance and were injured, defendant NOPSI had the burden of proving that it was without the slightest degree of negligence.
  • Johnson v. Franks 383 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Goodwin v. Stathes 381 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    That term is said to mean “clearly wrong.” and Canter v. Koehring Company, supra.
  • Comeaux v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. 381 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Cheatham v. City of New Orleans 378 So. 2d 369 La. 1979
    However, the survival damages should be shared equally by all members of the primary class of La.Civ.