Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hall v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co., 368 So. 2d 984.

29 citing documents.

Ross and Wallace Paper Products, Inc. v. Team Logistics, Inc. and Pittsburgh Logistics, Inc. d/b/a PLS Logistics Services La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
1989) ( citing Hall v. Arkansas - Louisiana Gas Company, ( La.
Payphone Connection Plus, Inc. v. Wagners Chef, LLC La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 5th Cir. 1984), (emphasis supplied).
Gordon v. Council of the City of New Orleans 977 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Supreme Court reversed, .
Williamson v. Haynes Best Western 688 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Bass v. Coupel 671 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Buxton v. McKendrick, 223 La.
DiVincenti v. McIntyre 611 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Dutton & Vaughan, Inc. v. Spurney 600 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Home Indemnity Co., (La.App.
ODECO Oil & Gas Co. v. Nunez 532 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
appears the following: Actual damages arising from a breach of contract must be proven; they cannot be merely speculative or conjectural....
Price v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 492 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
See The Anatomy of Proof in Civil Actions, 28 Louisiana Law Review 297, 304 (1968)
Consolidated Companies v. RST Enterprises, Inc. 496 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hoover v. Mid-South Exploration Co., Inc. 479 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Dunham v. Dunham 467 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
LeBlanc v. Gibbens Pools, Inc. 447 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
(Emphasis added) Our Louisiana Supreme Court has addressed the question of damages in a : Actual damages arising from a breach of contract must be proven; they cannot be merely speculative or conjectural....
Sauve Heirs, Inc. v. REYNADU CONST. CO., INC. 441 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Art. 1847, modified, other grounds 453 U.S. 571 , 10 S.Ct.
O'Neal v. Board of Regents of Higher Education 437 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
See, Long v. Foster and Associates, Inc., (La.App.
Hanson v. Louisiana State Racing Com'n 436 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Sanders v. Sanders, 62 So.2d *1312 284 (La., 1952).
Kehel v. Yahfoufi 433 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Sanders v. Sanders, 222 La.
Automatic Coin Enterprises, Inc. v. Vend-Tronics, Inc. 433 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Rehearing Denied, our Supreme Court made the following statements: Fraud, as applied to contracts, is the cause of an error bearing on a material part of the contract, created or continued by artifice, with design to obtain some unjust advantages to the one party, or to cause an inconvenience or loss to the
Thieneman v. Kahn 433 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Josephs v. Austin 420 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
Bischoff v. Brothers of the Sacred Heart 416 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Instead, he argues he must have known (or be presumed to have known) this knowledge would have precluded employment as a at p. 992: "Consent of the parties legally given is a requisite to the validity of a contract.
Amoco Production Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 415 So. 2d 1003 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
McPhail v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Rice, Inc. 419 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
appeal after remand, (La.App.
Curtis v. Curtis 403 So. 2d 56 La. 1981
Insurance Analysis, Inc. v. XPLO Corp. 398 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
the Louisiana Supreme Court simplified the meaning of these articles as follows: * * * * “These articles of our Code simply mean that error in the determining motive, or principal cause, of a contract vitiates consent and invalidates the contract.
Mitchell v. Bertolla 397 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Bearden v. Bearden 393 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
App.2d Cir. 1978), amended
LaFleur v. Brown & McKenzie, Inc. 388 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Hall v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 379 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980