Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

State v. Keys 694 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Johnson 693 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Franklin 693 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 6: By this, his final assignment, defendant argues that his sentence on count one was constitutionally excessive
State v. Louis 692 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Ray 692 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. King 692 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Lofton 691 So. 2d 1365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Planco 692 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. McManus 692 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Hopkins 692 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
*541 EXCESSIVE SENTENCE In this, his second assignment, the defendant complains that his sentence is constitutionally excessive
State v. Williams 692 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Williams 688 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
the supreme court determined that art. 1, § 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 authorized appellate review of individual sentences for excessiveness.
State v. Trosclair 691 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. McRoyal 687 So. 2d 371 La. 1997
Contrary to the majority, I believe that the trial judge acted within the parameters of his discretion to review sentences for excess
State v. Ethridge 688 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Handy 686 So. 2d 36 La. 1997
State v. Bastian 683 So. 2d 1220 La. 1996
State v. Warren 712 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Barnes 685 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Freelon, 26,938 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/10/95), .
State v. Johnson 684 So. 2d 526 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Ledet 694 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Goodman 684 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Roberts 683 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Demouchet 684 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Ruiz 684 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Armstrong 683 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. King 683 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Randleston 681 So. 2d 936 La. 1996
State v. Wilson 680 So. 2d 1169 La. 1996
State v. Milstead 681 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Bastian 681 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Abbott, 94-1046 (La.App.
State v. Morgan 680 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Cooper 678 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Johnson 676 So. 2d 552 La. 1996
State v. Williams 677 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
*695 (La.1979); (La.App.
State v. Walker 677 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Gordon 672 So. 2d 669 La. 1996
State v. Collins 677 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Anderson 677 So. 2d 480 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Nelson 674 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Morgan 673 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
It is a basis for extending the court's control over the entire sentencing process.'" as quoted in Dorthey, 623 So.2d at 1280 .
State v. Smith 672 So. 2d 1034 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
State v. Pyke 670 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Monette 670 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
a sentence within the statutory limits may still violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment.
State v. Cook 664 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
State v. Wingate 668 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Webster 666 So. 2d 654 La. 1996
State v. Hamilton 666 So. 2d 655 La. 1996
State v. Kelly 666 So. 2d 1082 La. 1996
State v. Lopez 670 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996