DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Sepulvado, 367 So. 2d 762.

1912 citing documents.

  • State v. Toussaint 502 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Lemelle 502 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Landry 502 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Joe 502 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    the Supreme Court held that a sentence imposed, although within the statutory limits, may still violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment, and that the alleged excessiveness of the sentence is reviewable by the appellate courts.
  • State v. Bolden 501 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Gray 502 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Aucoin 500 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Pierre 500 So. 2d 382 La. 1987
  • State v. Freeman 500 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Rousell 501 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Broussard 498 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Adams 498 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Nowacki 498 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Davis 499 So. 2d 729 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    the court held that it could review a sentence for excessiveness even if it was within the statutory limits.
  • State v. Walton 498 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Barbre 499 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    established the precedent that a sentence imposed, although within the statutory limits, may still violate the defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment, and that the alleged excessiveness of the sentence is reviewable by the appellate courts.
  • State v. White 498 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Donahue 499 So. 2d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    More recently however, the supreme court has held that, “the excessiveness of a sentence [is] a question of law reviewable under the appellate jurisdiction of this court.”
  • State v. Boyd 498 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Burge 498 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Wingerter 498 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Preston 498 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Parr 498 So. 2d 103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    appeal after remand (La.App.
  • State v. Cottingin 496 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Farmer 497 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Ezernack 496 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Prejean 496 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    decided that the imposition of a sentence, even though within the statutory limits, may be unconstitutionally excessive in violation of Article I, Section 20 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1974.
  • State v. Lutes 496 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    established the precedent that a sentence imposed, although within the statutory limits, may still violate the defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment, and that the alleged excessiveness of the sentence is reviewable by the appellate courts.
  • State v. Jardell 497 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Williams 497 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Prudhomme 499 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sterling 496 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hawkins 496 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Scott 496 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Davis 496 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Smith 496 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    appeal after remand, (La.App.
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that “the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant’s constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
  • State v. Piazza 496 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
    Nevertheless, , (La.1978), same case, the court expressly stated that "the imposition of a sentence although within the statutory limits may violate a defendant's constitutional right against excessive punishment that is enforceable ...
  • State v. Deboue 496 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Payton 496 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Miller 495 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Victorian 495 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Steele 495 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Ortiz 495 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dew 495 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Dew 495 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Johnson 495 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    3 Cir.1983), writ denied, (La.App.
  • State v. Myers 495 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • State v. Hobdy 494 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    2d Cir.1983), writ den., (1983)
  • State v. Olds 494 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986